Rock-Paper-Scissors-Everything: Group Edition

So a few years back, I came up with a game called Rock-Paper-Scissors-Everything. It works like this:

-Two people count to three and then shout out any object at all.
-Then they argue about which of their objects wins, and observers vote on which argument is better. Whoever wins the argument wins that round.

This is a variant. Here's how it works:

-I post the name of an object.
-The next five people to post pick an object to respond to mine with. (If two people post at almost the same time, I'll expand it, but I want to try to keep things sort of reasonable.)
-Everyone argues about why their object beats mine. Whoever has the best argument is the winner, and can start the next round if they want.

I will post again in a moment with my play for the first round. Let's see how this turns out.

Birds.

BEES.

Stones.

Sheep

Plastic Waste

Acid rain

Demons

Okay, there were six by the time I checked, so we're going with that.

So, everyone make your case for why your play beats mine.

Just to review:
Whimbrel - Bees
Para - Stones
a52 - Sheep
Reyweld - Plastic Waste
Schazer - Acid Rain
Credit - Demons

Demons aren't real, plastic waste is incapable of harming anyone not dumb enough to ingest it, and everything else suffers from erosion

My case:



Also I up-vote stones by Paranoia.

Demons aren't real, plastic waste is incapable of harming anyone not dumb enough to ingest it, and everything else suffers from erosion

my rebuttal

Demons aren't real, plastic waste is incapable of harming anyone not dumb enough to ingest it, and everything else suffers from erosion

Counter points:

• Birds are dumb
  
• Not all birds are birds
  
• Demons don't need to be real to KICK THOSE BIRDS BEHINDS
  

Clarification: the argument that actually wins you the round is the one about how your choice defeats mine, namely birds.

How it would fare directly against anyone else's choice is an amusing side issue that you're welcome to explore, but I'm not awarding a win if that's all you've got.

Look, I don't think I even have to explain my choice, I'm sure you've heard all about the birds and the bees from your parents, so you should know EXACTLY how this confrontation plays out, and why the victor in this senseless conflict is inevitably the bee.

so is the bee on top or bottom

I'm not sure, but they while flying

I submit that you can take out two birds (as in multiple birds) with one stone.

By that logic, you can take out even more birds with two stones!

And do not think of what power you hold in your hands with ten stones.

wheat you are NOT HELPING

And do not think of what power you hold in your hands with ten stones.

it's called juggling. and it's a very dangerous form of martial arts.

Sheep are bigger than birds

the rock johnson

Look, I don't think I even have to explain my choice, I'm sure you've heard all about the birds and the bees from your parents, so you should know EXACTLY how this confrontation plays out, and why the victor in this senseless conflict is inevitably the bee.

there's a group of birds called bee-eaters.

Filthy perverts

How many birds are we talking about here? Schazer's comment about erosion might still come into play.

"See this valley boy? It took millions of years and countless generations of disoriented birds slamming their soft feathery bodies against the mountainside to form the place we now call home."

i'm pretty sure whimbrel was referring to beaters. Which are very useful in cooking. Y'know who cooks well? Demons. There are campside fires everywhere where they live. They've developed a talent for cuisine far beyond that of birds and their worms.