Post making contest 1.0

This is test #5.

This post breaks rules, though I don't know exactly which.

End of message.

This post breaks rules 2 and 3.

I guess we'll just never know how these mysterious rules work.

I guess we'll just never know how these mysterious rules work.

This post breaks rules 1, 2, 3, and 5.

This is test #6.

This is test #4.

Similar to test #3, which involved me saying some words, I am saying some here too. Unlike test #2, it does not contain a quote.

End of message.

This post breaks rules... well, actually come to think of it...

End of message.

This is test #6.

This is test #4.

Similar to test #3, which involved me saying some words, I am saying some here too. Unlike test #2, it does not contain a quote.

End of message.

This post breaks rules... well, actually come to think of it...

End of message.

This post breaks rules 2 and 3.

This is test #7. This post breaks rule 3.

End of message.

This is test #7. This post breaks rule 3.

End of message.

This post breaks rules 2 and 3.

This is test #8.

...except it's really an aside at how rule 4 seems inviolable, and I seem incapable of violating rule 5 for some reason. I'll return to serious testing in a bit...

End of message.

This is test #8.

...except it's really an aside at how rule 4 seems inviolable, and I seem incapable of violating rule 5 for some reason. I'll return to serious testing in a bit...

End of message.

This post breaks rules 2 and 3.

Okay we've not seen rule 4 yet. Here's a concerted attempt to break it:

1. formatting! you know the drill by this point
   
2. now the other kind of formatting
   
3. a third type?
   

SpoilerShow

SpoilerShow

boy am i gonna feel silly if there was a rule _four breaker already in ^our midst!

fggytfhikjnhyuguybuih
blorp

This is test #9. It consists of an alteration to test #7 in an attempt to fix a potential source of rule violation.

End of message.

Okay we've not seen rule 4 yet. Here's a concerted attempt to break it:

1. formatting! you know the drill by this point
   
2. now the other kind of formatting
   
3. a third type?
   

SpoilerShow

SpoilerShow

boy am i gonna feel silly if there was a rule _four breaker already in ^our midst!

This post breaks rules 2, 3, and 4. Congratulations on being the first to break rule 4.

fggytfhikjnhyuguybuih
blorp

This post breaks rules 1, 2, 3, and 5.

This is test #9. It consists of an alteration to test #7 in an attempt to fix a potential source of rule violation.

End of message.

This post breaks rules 2 and 3.

For clarity in analyzing Ix's post, I'm going to note that I'm not evaluating anything in tags, URLs, or in the contents of pictures or videos.

For clarity in analyzing Ix's post, I'm going to note that I'm not evaluating anything in tags, URLs, or in the contents of pictures or videos.

This post violates rules 2 and 3.

This is test #10.

This is test #1.

End of message.

End of message.

To further clarify: I am evaluating emoticons as they're written, so would be treated as:

Code:

:factseagull:

This includes the colons.

Also by "in tags", I mean "actually inside the brackets". For example, if someone says "food", I evaluate "food" but ignore the brackets and all things inside them.

I hope this clears things up.

This is test #10.

This is test #1.

End of message.

End of message.

This post breaks rules 1, 2, and 3.

To further clarify: I am evaluating emoticons as they're written, so would be treated as:

Code:

:factseagull:

This includes the colons.

Also by "in tags", I mean "actually inside the brackets". For example, if someone says "food", I evaluate "food" but ignore the brackets and all things inside them.

I hope this clears things up.

This post breaks rules 1, 2, 3, and 4.

This is test #11.

Rule 2 baffles me.

End of message.

This is test #11.

Rule 2 baffles me.

End of message.

This post breaks rules 1 and 2.

This is test #12.

And now I don't know rule 1 any more. But eh, I know how not to break it. That counts for something.

End of message.

This is test #12.

And now I don't know rule 1 any more. But eh, I know how not to break it. That counts for something.

End of message.

This post breaks rules 1 and 2.

This is test #13.

At least I'm pretty confident on how to break rule 3... I mean, that leaves 1 and 2, but still...

Oh, and I think you're still invisible from when you were testing that for my set, Fogel.

End of message.

This is test #13.

At least I'm pretty confident on how to break rule 3... I mean, that leaves 1 and 2, but still...

Oh, and I think you're still invisible from when you were testing that for my set, Fogel.

End of message.

This post breaks rule 2.

While Sruix is trying to play bombs I'm gonna swoop in and solve the post rules.