Fanglesblath

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Fanglesblath
#10
RE: Fanglesblath
(03-02-2013, 02:49 PM)AgentBlue Wrote: »There's always blopnfnimfn if you get really, really desperate.

You're trying to thiddenthadden him, not make a dgsanjl out of yourself! You won't stay a Fanglesblath for long if you bjanldgr the Unngoglaki with your blopnfnimfn. There has to be a better pnord.

(03-02-2013, 05:52 PM)btp Wrote: »...uhhhh plook?

You awkwardly suggest plook, as a faster alternative to being ghofdd.

"Plook is inadequate to express the depth of my bbbdls," Jnnnnn'nnnn replies, shaking his divrwm. "I could not bring myself to face the glbmn if I failed to ghofd you properly on Ghhhmin."

Ghhhmin! So much trouble could have been avoided if your nnavr hadn't coincided with that sdfs. You surely could have persuaded him to settle for plook if it weren't Ghhhmin.

Which gives you the slightest mldif of an omdn. Is there some way you could klvl him into thinking it isn't Ghhhmin after all?


Messages In This Thread
Fanglesblath - by Dragon Fogel - 03-01-2013, 07:54 AM
RE: Fanglesblath - by AgentBlue - 03-01-2013, 07:58 AM
RE: Fanglesblath - by Dragon Fogel - 03-01-2013, 08:01 AM
RE: Fanglesblath - by Phish - 03-01-2013, 07:59 AM
RE: Fanglesblath - by Elize - 03-01-2013, 08:02 AM
RE: Fanglesblath - by AgentBlue - 03-01-2013, 09:20 AM
RE: Fanglesblath - by Dragon Fogel - 03-02-2013, 02:45 AM
RE: Fanglesblath - by AgentBlue - 03-02-2013, 02:49 PM
RE: Fanglesblath - by btp - 03-02-2013, 05:52 PM
RE: Fanglesblath - by Dragon Fogel - 05-14-2016, 04:49 AM
RE: Fanglesblath - by OTTO - 05-14-2016, 04:20 PM
RE: Fanglesblath - by Wavedarq - 05-14-2016, 06:13 PM
RE: Fanglesblath - by a52 - 05-14-2016, 10:35 PM
RE: Fanglesblath - by Dragon Fogel - 05-15-2016, 05:07 AM
RE: Fanglesblath - by btp - 05-15-2016, 05:32 AM