Post making contest 1.0

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post making contest 1.0
RE: Post making contest
Here is a hint: the rule passed by my original post was rule 4.
RE: Post making contest
(05-02-2016, 05:23 PM)btp Wrote: »"What do you guys think?"

"1 and 5 seem to be simple inclusive, and I think this post will pass them."

[Image: uqn008S.gif?dateline=1365454420]

"This post passes 5 out of 5 of the current set."
RE: Post making contest
(05-02-2016, 04:41 AM)Akumu Wrote: »New set!

This post follows only one of the set.
RE: Post making contest
(05-02-2016, 05:23 PM)btp Wrote: »"What do you guys think? Are any of Akumu's rules simple exclusive or simple inclusive? How would you categorize some of the other possible rules?"

"1 and 5 seem to be simple inclusive, and I'm pretty sure this post will pass rules."

[Image: uqn008S.gif?dateline=1365454420]

"At a glance 4 seems to be simple exclusive, as blank posts pass it. However, combining posts that pass it has produced posts that rules."

"We had a theory on 2 that would be simple inclusive but it isn't working rules."
RE: Post making contest
(05-02-2016, 05:23 PM)btp Wrote: »"What do you guys think?"

"1 and 5 seem to be simple inclusive, and I think this post will pass them."

[Image: uqn008S.gif?dateline=1365454420]

SpoilerShow
RE: Post making contest
(05-04-2016, 12:28 AM)CrimsonMage Wrote: »
(05-02-2016, 05:23 PM)btp Wrote: »"What do you guys think?"

"1 and 5 seem to be simple inclusive, and I think this post will pass them."

[Image: uqn008S.gif?dateline=1365454420]

"This post passes 5 out of 5 of the current set."

This post breaks rule 4.

(05-04-2016, 12:30 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »
(05-02-2016, 04:41 AM)Akumu Wrote: »New set!

This post follows only one of the set.

This post breaks rules 2, 3, and 5.

(05-04-2016, 12:31 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »
(05-02-2016, 05:23 PM)btp Wrote: »"What do you guys think? Are any of Akumu's rules simple exclusive or simple inclusive? How would you categorize some of the other possible rules?"

"1 and 5 seem to be simple inclusive, and I'm pretty sure this post will pass rules."

[Image: uqn008S.gif?dateline=1365454420]

"At a glance 4 seems to be simple exclusive, as blank posts pass it. However, combining posts that pass it has produced posts that rules."

"We had a theory on 2 that would be simple inclusive but it isn't working rules."

This post breaks rule 4.

(05-04-2016, 01:40 AM)btp Wrote: »
(05-02-2016, 05:23 PM)btp Wrote: »"What do you guys think?"

"1 and 5 seem to be simple inclusive, and I think this post will pass them."

[Image: uqn008S.gif?dateline=1365454420]

SpoilerShow

This post breaks rule 1.
RE: Post making contest
(05-02-2016, 05:23 PM)btp Wrote: »"What do you guys think?"

"1 and 5 seem to be simple inclusive, and I think this post will pass them."

[Image: uqn008S.gif?dateline=1365454420]

"This post passes 5 out of 5 of the current set."
RE: Post making contest
(05-02-2016, 05:23 PM)btp Wrote: »"What do you guys think?"

"1 and 5 seem to be simple inclusive, and I think this post will pass them."

[Image: uqn008S.gif?dateline=1365454420]

SpoilerShow
RE: Post making contest
(05-04-2016, 02:08 AM)btp Wrote: »
(05-02-2016, 05:23 PM)btp Wrote: »"What do you guys think?"

"1 and 5 seem to be simple inclusive, and I think this post will pass them."

[Image: uqn008S.gif?dateline=1365454420]

"This post passes 5 out of 5 of the current set."

This post breaks rule 1.

(05-04-2016, 02:10 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »
(05-02-2016, 05:23 PM)btp Wrote: »"What do you guys think?"

"1 and 5 seem to be simple inclusive, and I think this post will pass them."

[Image: uqn008S.gif?dateline=1365454420]

SpoilerShow

This post breaks rule 4.
RE: Post making contest
(05-02-2016, 05:23 PM)btp Wrote: »"What do you guys think?"

"1 and 5 seem to be simple inclusive, and I think this post will pass them."

[Image: uqn008S.gif?dateline=1365454420]

"This post passes 5 out of 5 of the current set."


This post breaks rule 1

"What do you guys think?"


"1 and 5 seem to be simple inclusive, and I think this post will pass them."

[Image: uqn008S.gif?dateline=1365454420]

SpoilerShow


This post breaks rule 4.
RE: Post making contest
(05-04-2016, 02:24 AM)btp Wrote: »
(05-02-2016, 05:23 PM)btp Wrote: »"What do you guys think?"

"1 and 5 seem to be simple inclusive, and I think this post will pass them."

[Image: uqn008S.gif?dateline=1365454420]

"This post passes 5 out of 5 of the current set."


This post breaks rule 1

"What do you guys think?"


"1 and 5 seem to be simple inclusive, and I think this post will pass them."

[Image: uqn008S.gif?dateline=1365454420]

SpoilerShow


This post breaks rule 4.

This post breaks rule 1.
RE: Post making contest
sssssss
RE: Post making contest
(05-02-2016, 05:23 PM)btp Wrote: »"What is it you guys think?"

"1 and 5 seem to be simple inclusive, and I think this post will pass them."

[Image: uqn008S.gif?dateline=1365454420]

"This post passes 5 out of 5 of the current set."
RE: Post making contest
(05-04-2016, 02:33 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »sssssss

This post breaks rules 1, 2, 3, and 5.

(05-04-2016, 02:35 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »
(05-02-2016, 05:23 PM)btp Wrote: »"What is it you guys think?"

"1 and 5 seem to be simple inclusive, and I think this post will pass them."

[Image: uqn008S.gif?dateline=1365454420]

"This post passes 5 out of 5 of the current set."

This post breaks rule 4.

I said this in Discord and I'll say it here too for everyone's benefit: if you're confused about rule 1, you should probably look at claims made in post 1805 and then look very carefully at post 1774.
RE: Post making contest
sssssssssss
RE: Post making contest
either fogel's a snake now or a bomb and i'm scared either way
RE: Post making contest
(05-04-2016, 02:39 AM)Akumu Wrote: »"I said this in Discord and I'll say it here too for everyone's benefit: if you're confused about rule 1, you should probably look at claims made in post 1805 and then look very carefully at post 1774."

"So the quote link in 1774 links to one of Bob's posts. It appears that you must have a link that points to someone else's post to pass rule 1."

[Image: uqn008S.gif?dateline=1365454420]

"I still have no idea about Rule 4."
RE: Post making contest
(05-04-2016, 02:42 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »sssssssssss

This post breaks rules 1, 2, 3, and 5.

(05-04-2016, 02:44 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »either fogel's a snake now or a bomb and i'm scared either way

This post breaks every rule!

(05-04-2016, 02:44 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »
(05-04-2016, 02:39 AM)Akumu Wrote: »"I said this in Discord and I'll say it here too for everyone's benefit: if you're confused about rule 1, you should probably look at claims made in post 1805 and then look very carefully at post 1774."

"So the quote link in 1774 links to one of Bob's posts. It appears that you must have a link that points to someone else's post to pass rule 1."

[Image: uqn008S.gif?dateline=1365454420]

"I still have no idea about Rule 4."

This post breaks rules 3 and 4.
RE: Post making contest
This page is absolute Trubbish
RE: Post making contest
(05-04-2016, 02:46 AM)Granolaman Wrote: »This page is absolute Trubbish

This post breaks every rule!!!
RE: Post making contest
ssssss sssss
RE: Post making contest
(05-04-2016, 02:39 AM)Akumu Wrote: »"I said this in Discord and I'll say it here too for everyone's benefit: if you're confused about rule 1, you should probably look at claims made in post 1805 and then look very carefully at post 1774."

"So the quote link in 1774 links to one of Bob's posts. It appears that you must have a link that points to someone else's post to pass rule 1."

[Image: uqn008S.gif?dateline=1365454420]

"I still have no idea about Rule 4, BUDDY."
RE: Post making contest
(05-04-2016, 02:46 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »ssssss sssss

This post breaks rules 1, 2, 3, and 5.

(05-04-2016, 02:50 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »
(05-04-2016, 02:39 AM)Akumu Wrote: »"I said this in Discord and I'll say it here too for everyone's benefit: if you're confused about rule 1, you should probably look at claims made in post 1805 and then look very carefully at post 1774."

"So the quote link in 1774 links to one of Bob's posts. It appears that you must have a link that points to someone else's post to pass rule 1."

[Image: uqn008S.gif?dateline=1365454420]

"I still have no idea about Rule 4, BUDDY."

This post breaks rules 3 and 4.
RE: Post making contest
(05-04-2016, 02:42 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »sssssssssss

"i'm starting afresh here but i don't believe it's gonna help me, not one iota."

:itis:

"i wish sruix was here for this nightmare."
RE: Post making contest
(05-04-2016, 02:42 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »sssssssssss

"i'm starting afresh here but i don't believe it's gonna help me, not one iota."

Its a mastery

"i wish sruix was here for this nightmare."