Post making contest 1.0

While Sruix is trying to play bombs I'm gonna swoop in and solve the post rules.

This post breaks rules 2 and 3.

This is test #13.

At least I'm pretty confident on how to break rule 3... I mean, that leaves 1 and 2, but still...

Oh, and I think you're still invisible from when you were testing that for my set, Fogel.

End of message.

This is test #13.

At least I'm pretty confident on how to break rule 3... I mean, that leaves 1 and 2, but still...

Oh, and I think you're still invisible from when you were testing that for my set, Fogel.

End of message.

This post breaks rule 2.

This is test #13.

At least I'm pretty confident on how to break rule 3... I mean, that leaves 1 and 2, but still...

Oh, and I think you're still invisible from when you were testing that for my set, Fogel.

End of message.

This is test #13.

At least I'm pretty confident on how to break rule 3... I mean, that leaves 1 and 2, but still...

Oh, and I think you're still invisible from when you were testing that for my set, Fogel.

End of message.

Once again, we have a post that only breaks Rule 2.

A post.

This post breaks rules 2, 3 and 5.

This is test #13.

At least I'm pretty confident on how to break rule 3... I mean, that leaves 1 and 2, but still...

Oh, and I think you're still invisible from when you were testing that for my set, Fogel.

End of message.

1 post.

Breaks rules 2, 3, and 5.

This is test #13.

At least I'm pretty confident on how to break rule 3... I mean, that leaves 1 and 2, but still...

Oh, and I think you're still invisible from when you were testing that for my set, Fogel.

End of message.

Breaks rule 2.

Names in quote boxes are inside tag brackets, and as such are irrelevant for rule purposes.

Two posts exist.

Breaks rules 2 and 5.

Two posts exist.

Breaks rules 2 and 5.

Winky

Breaks rules 2 and 5.

What is the haps in this thread?

Breaks rules 1, 2, and 3.

Two posts exist.

winky

Breaks rules 2 and 3.

brace yourselves i think i'm about to have a breakthrough!!!

This post breaks rules 1, 2, 3, and 5.

Oh, and I think you're still invisible from when you were testing that for my set, Fogel.

End of message.

This is test #13.

At least I'm pretty confident on how to break rule 3... I mean, that leaves 1 and 2, but still...

Oh, and I think you're still invisible from when you were testing that for my set, Fogel.

End of message.

This post breaks rules 1, 2, 3, and 5.

This is test #13.

At least I'm pretty confident on how to break rule 3... I mean, that leaves 1 and 2, but still...

This breaks rule 2.

That's an impressive display of breaking the rules, if I do say so myself.


I do not understand the rules at all.

This post breaks rules 2 and 3.

Let me just say:

This is test #13.

At least I'm pretty confident on how to break rule 3... I mean, that leaves 1 and 2, but still...

This post breaks rule 2.

This is test #13.

At least I'm pretty confident on how to break rule 3... I mean, that leaves 1 and 2, but still...

This is test #13.

Breaks rules 1, 2, and 3.

I'll say one more thing:

This is test #13.

At least I'm pretty confident on how to break rule 3... I mean, that leaves 1 and 2, but still...

welcome to the space olympics

Breaks rule 2.

At least I'm pretty confident on how to break rule 3... I mean, that leaves 1 and 2, but still...

Breaks rule 2.

What if I were to say, "Welcome to the Space Consortium?"

Breaks rule 3 and 5.

what the heck is rule 2 i don't understand

At least I'm pretty confident on how to break rule 3... I mean, that leaves 1 and 2, but still...

What if I were to say, "Welcome to the Space Consortium?"

At least I'm pretty confident on how to break rule 3... I mean, that leaves 1 and 2, but still...

Breaks rule 2.

What if I were to say, "Welcome to the Space Consortium?"

Breaks rule 3 and 5.

g0m