Posts: 2,535
Joined: Aug 2011
Pronouns: eh
Location: seaside and spires
04-22-2016, 08:39 PM
POINT OF NOTE: Due to the fact that I am not currently giving this my full attention, I missed the fact that post #166 violates rule 5. Since I would like to keep future mistakes to a minimum, this will probably be the last post for an hour or so. Probably.
(04-22-2016, 08:09 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Quote:Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.
Is that difficult to check?*
Rule 3 ;)
This post violates rules 1 and 4.
(04-22-2016, 08:10 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Lankie Wrote:Does this violate Rule 4?
This post violates rules 1, 2 and 4.
(04-22-2016, 08:11 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: » ;)*&
Will this pass rule 4?
This post violates rules 1 and 4.
We just don't know. This post violates rules 1, 2 and 4. Rule 3 is satisfied, technically, but not ideally.
Posts: 4,983
Joined: Jan 2000
Pronouns:
Location:
04-22-2016, 08:49 PM
You must be registered to view this content.
Posts: 10,065
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
Posts: 10,065
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
04-22-2016, 08:51 PM
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »
So will this make it through Rule 4?
Posts: 10,065
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
Posts: 10,065
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
Posts: 2,535
Joined: Aug 2011
Pronouns: eh
Location: seaside and spires
04-22-2016, 09:13 PM
This post violates rules 1, 2 and 4.
(04-22-2016, 08:50 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:13 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:42 PM)Lankie Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: » ;)*&
These are the only posts to pass Rule 4.
(04-22-2016, 03:22 PM)Lankie Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:13 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »
Here is some writing outside the quote.
This is identical to an earlier post aside from the additional writing. It violates Rule 4, and the same rules as the earlier posts.
This post violates rules 1, 3, 4 and 5.
(04-22-2016, 08:51 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »
So will this make it through Rule 4?
This post violates rules 1, 2 and 4.
(04-22-2016, 08:53 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »
This post violates rules 1, 2 and 3.
(04-22-2016, 08:57 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »
This post violates rules 1, 2 and 3.
Posts: 6,617
Joined: Dec 2014
Pronouns: He/Him (or They/Them)
Location: Hell-Place, Ontario
04-22-2016, 09:18 PM
Sig:
Show Content
Spoiler
(03-02-2015, 02:07 AM)Papers Wrote: »i don't know what i expected from reyweld's new hawkspace thread (06-02-2016, 04:16 AM)Schazer Wrote: »Tokyo could kick your scrawny ass (11-10-2017, 06:39 PM)Myeth Wrote: »reach for the stars
And then annihilate them as a powermove (02-06-2017, 01:02 AM)Justice Watch Wrote: »
Show Content
Spoiler
Posts: 3,941
Joined: Nov 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
04-22-2016, 09:34 PM
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?
;)
Posts: 2,535
Joined: Aug 2011
Pronouns: eh
Location: seaside and spires
04-22-2016, 09:41 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-22-2016, 09:43 PM by Sruixan.)
(04-22-2016, 09:18 PM)Reyweld Wrote: »Quote:.
This post violates rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and, if I'm being strict, 5.
(04-22-2016, 09:34 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?
;)
This post violates rules 1 and 2.
Posts: 3,941
Joined: Nov 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
Posts: 3,941
Joined: Nov 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
04-22-2016, 09:51 PM
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?*
Posts: 2,535
Joined: Aug 2011
Pronouns: eh
Location: seaside and spires
04-22-2016, 09:55 PM
(04-22-2016, 09:46 PM)btp Wrote: »What about this? ;)
This post violates rules 1, 2 and 5.
(04-22-2016, 09:51 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?*
This post violates rules 1, 2 and 5.
Posts: 3,941
Joined: Nov 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
04-22-2016, 10:03 PM
(04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.
Is that difficult to check?*
Rule 3 ;)
Any closer?
Posts: 2,535
Joined: Aug 2011
Pronouns: eh
Location: seaside and spires
04-22-2016, 10:23 PM
(04-22-2016, 10:03 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.
Is that difficult to check?*
Rule 3 ;)
Any closer?
This post violates rules 1 and 4.
Posts: 10,065
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
04-22-2016, 11:16 PM
(04-22-2016, 09:34 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?
;)
(04-22-2016, 10:03 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.
Is that difficult to check?*
Rule 3 ;)
Any closer?
Posts: 2,535
Joined: Aug 2011
Pronouns: eh
Location: seaside and spires
04-22-2016, 11:26 PM
(04-22-2016, 11:16 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 09:34 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?
;)
(04-22-2016, 10:03 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.
Is that difficult to check?*
Rule 3 ;)
Any closer?
This post violates rules 1, 4 and 5.
Posts: 1,380
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Location: Wiscaaansin
04-22-2016, 11:34 PM
(04-22-2016, 11:16 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 09:34 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?
;)
(04-22-2016, 10:03 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.
Is that difficult to check?*
Rule 3 ;)
Any closer?
Posts: 2,535
Joined: Aug 2011
Pronouns: eh
Location: seaside and spires
04-22-2016, 11:42 PM
(04-22-2016, 11:34 PM)Granolaman Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 11:16 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 09:34 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?
;)
(04-22-2016, 10:03 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.
Is that difficult to check?*
Rule 3 ;)
Any closer?
This post violates rules 1, 4 and 5.
Posts: 1,380
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Location: Wiscaaansin
04-23-2016, 12:07 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-23-2016, 12:08 AM by Granolaman.)
#125
(04-22-2016, 03:08 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:03 PM)Sruixan Wrote: »...ah, balls to it. I'm procrastinating something fierce right now anyway.
This is post #1. It violates the following rules: 1, 2, 3 and 4.
#144
(04-22-2016, 03:49 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?
#147
(04-22-2016, 04:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?
&
#154
(04-22-2016, 06:58 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan Wrote:
#157
(04-22-2016, 07:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Thanks! I can't believe I misspelled Sruixan the first time!
#160
(04-22-2016, 07:27 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » g0m Sruixan
Only posts so far to pass Rule 1. Content doesn't appear to be the factor. Anyone see anything in the timestamps/post number?
Sruix isn't allowed to sleep til we solve this.
Also note Sruix lives in a different timezone than most of us.
Posts: 10,065
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
04-23-2016, 12:17 AM
(04-22-2016, 11:16 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 09:34 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?
;)
This violated 1 and 2.
(04-22-2016, 10:03 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.
Is that difficult to check?*
Rule 3 ;)
Any closer?
This violated 1 and 4.
Together, they violate 1, 4, and 5.
Posts: 10,065
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
04-23-2016, 12:22 AM
Here's something I just noticed about those Rule 1 posts.
All but one of them immediately followed a post (not counting Sruix's rule-checks_ that violated rules 1-4. This post is the only exception.
Maybe Rule 1 has something to do with the previous post?
Posts: 10,065
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
Posts: 2,535
Joined: Aug 2011
Pronouns: eh
Location: seaside and spires
04-23-2016, 12:34 AM
(04-23-2016, 12:07 AM)Granolaman Wrote: »#125
(04-22-2016, 03:08 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:03 PM)Sruixan Wrote: »...ah, balls to it. I'm procrastinating something fierce right now anyway.
This is post #1. It violates the following rules: 1, 2, 3 and 4.
#144
(04-22-2016, 03:49 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?
#147
(04-22-2016, 04:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?
&
#154
(04-22-2016, 06:58 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan Wrote:
#157
(04-22-2016, 07:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Thanks! I can't believe I misspelled Sruixan the first time!
#160
(04-22-2016, 07:27 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » g0m Sruixan
Only posts so far to pass Rule 1. Content doesn't appear to be the factor. Anyone see anything in the timestamps/post number?
Sruix isn't allowed to sleep til we solve this.
Also note Sruix lives in a different timezone than most of us.
This post violates rules 4 and 5.
I would also like you guys to solve this before I go to bed. Also, I'm writing this in purple now because I just previewed this post and dear lord it's pretty dense otherwise.
(04-23-2016, 12:17 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 11:16 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 09:34 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?
;)
This violated 1 and 2.
(04-22-2016, 10:03 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.
Is that difficult to check?*
Rule 3 ;)
Any closer?
This violated 1 and 4.
Together, they violate 1, 4, and 5.
This post violates rules 1 and 4.
(04-23-2016, 12:22 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Here's something I just noticed about those Rule 1 posts.
All but one of them immediately followed a post (not counting Sruix's rule-checks_ that violated rules 1-4. This post is the only exception.
Maybe Rule 1 has something to do with the previous post?
This post violates rules 1, 4 and 5.
(04-23-2016, 12:29 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Okay. So I found several posts immediately following 1,2,3,4-breaking posts that still broke Rule 1. I guess that's a coincidence.
These are the posts, to be more specific:
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123225
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123247
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123230
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123275
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123281
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123286
This post violates rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Posts: 10,065
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
04-23-2016, 12:36 AM
Oh wait, gom Sruixan wasn't after a 1-4 violation, it was after a 1-3 and 5 violation.
It also doesn't seem to have anything to do with the poster of the previous message, as Bob has gotten successful Rule 1s when I had the last message and when he did. He has also failed Rule 1 in both cases.
I also considered "starts with the final letter of the previous post" but that didn't get me anywhere.
|