Posts: 10,065
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
04-23-2016, 12:39 AM
(04-23-2016, 12:34 AM)Sruixan Wrote: » (04-23-2016, 12:07 AM)Granolaman Wrote: »#125
(04-22-2016, 03:08 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:03 PM)Sruixan Wrote: »...ah, balls to it. I'm procrastinating something fierce right now anyway.
This is post #1. It violates the following rules: 1, 2, 3 and 4.
#144
(04-22-2016, 03:49 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?
#147
(04-22-2016, 04:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?
&
#154
(04-22-2016, 06:58 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan Wrote:
#157
(04-22-2016, 07:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Thanks! I can't believe I misspelled Sruixan the first time!
#160
(04-22-2016, 07:27 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » g0m Sruixan
Only posts so far to pass Rule 1. Content doesn't appear to be the factor. Anyone see anything in the timestamps/post number?
Sruix isn't allowed to sleep til we solve this.
Also note Sruix lives in a different timezone than most of us.
This post violates rules 4 and 5.
I would also like you guys to solve this before I go to bed. Also, I'm writing this in purple now because I just previewed this post and dear lord it's pretty dense otherwise.
(04-23-2016, 12:17 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 11:16 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 09:34 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?
;)
This violated 1 and 2.
(04-22-2016, 10:03 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.
Is that difficult to check?*
Rule 3 ;)
Any closer?
This violated 1 and 4.
Together, they violate 1, 4, and 5.
This post violates rules 1 and 4.
(04-23-2016, 12:22 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Here's something I just noticed about those Rule 1 posts.
All but one of them immediately followed a post (not counting Sruix's rule-checks_ that violated rules 1-4. This post is the only exception.
Maybe Rule 1 has something to do with the previous post?
This post violates rules 1, 4 and 5.
(04-23-2016, 12:29 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Okay. So I found several posts immediately following 1,2,3,4-breaking posts that still broke Rule 1. I guess that's a coincidence.
These are the posts, to be more specific:
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123225
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123247
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123230
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123275
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123281
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123286
This post violates rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Posts: 2,535
Joined: Aug 2011
Pronouns: eh
Location: seaside and spires
04-23-2016, 12:49 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-23-2016, 12:51 AM by Sruixan.)
(04-23-2016, 12:36 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Oh wait, gom Sruixan wasn't after a 1-4 violation, it was after a 1-3 and 5 violation.
It also doesn't seem to have anything to do with the poster of the previous message, as Bob has gotten successful Rule 1s when I had the last message and when he did. He has also failed Rule 1 in both cases.
I also considered "starts with the final letter of the previous post" but that didn't get me anywhere.
This post violates rules 2, 3 and 4.
[POST #201, WHICH I AM NOT QUOTING FOR BREVITY]
This post violates rule 4.
EDIT: okay it doesn't actually violate rule 5 it's late and that was a long post
Posts: 3,941
Joined: Nov 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
04-23-2016, 12:51 AM
Rule 1: Changes even when the exact same message is given
Rule 2: No idea. Maybe it's some kind of range?
Rule 3: Post must ask a question
Rule 4: No idea. Some posts that quote or link to Lankie's post pass it and some do not.
Rule 5: Also no idea.
Well we have 1/5 for sure.
Fairly Intelligent Foxie Hivemind
Offline
Posts: 4,885
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns: it/she
Location: hell world
04-23-2016, 12:52 AM
Sruix is just too good at puzzles. Hot damn.
Posts: 2,535
Joined: Aug 2011
Pronouns: eh
Location: seaside and spires
04-23-2016, 12:57 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-23-2016, 01:04 AM by Sruixan.)
(04-23-2016, 12:51 AM)btp Wrote: »Rule 1: Changes even when the exact same message is given
Rule 2: No idea. Maybe it's some kind of range?
Rule 3: Post must ask a question
Rule 4: No idea. Some posts that quote or link to Lankie's post pass it and some do not.
Rule 5: Also no idea.
Well we have 1/5 for sure.
This post violates rules 1, 2, 4 and 5.
(04-23-2016, 12:52 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »Sruix is just too good at puzzles. Hot damn.
SECRET RULE 6!
...and also this post violates rules 1, 2, 3 and 4.
NOT QUITE A HINT BUT MORE AN ADVISORY: I like my posts on the shorter side, uncharacteristically.
EDIT: I KEEP MAKING MISTAKES
Posts: 3,941
Joined: Nov 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
04-23-2016, 01:03 AM
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?
Posts: 3,941
Joined: Nov 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
04-23-2016, 01:05 AM
(04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.
Is that difficult to check?*
Rule 3
Any closer?
Posts: 3,941
Joined: Nov 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
04-23-2016, 01:05 AM
(04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.
Is that difficult to check?
Rule 3 ;)
Any closer?
Posts: 3,941
Joined: Nov 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
04-23-2016, 01:09 AM
(04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.Is that difficult to check?Rule 3 ;) Any closer?
Posts: 1,380
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Location: Wiscaaansin
04-23-2016, 01:13 AM
Show Content
Spoiler (04-23-2016, 12:39 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-23-2016, 12:34 AM)Sruixan Wrote: » (04-23-2016, 12:07 AM)Granolaman Wrote: »#125
(04-22-2016, 03:08 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:03 PM)Sruixan Wrote: »...ah, balls to it. I'm procrastinating something fierce right now anyway.
This is post #1. It violates the following rules: 1, 2, 3 and 4.
#144
(04-22-2016, 03:49 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?
#147
(04-22-2016, 04:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?
&
#154
(04-22-2016, 06:58 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan Wrote:
#157
(04-22-2016, 07:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Thanks! I can't believe I misspelled Sruixan the first time!
#160
(04-22-2016, 07:27 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » g0m Sruixan
Only posts so far to pass Rule 1. Content doesn't appear to be the factor. Anyone see anything in the timestamps/post number?
Sruix isn't allowed to sleep til we solve this.
Also note Sruix lives in a different timezone than most of us.
This post violates rules 4 and 5.
I would also like you guys to solve this before I go to bed. Also, I'm writing this in purple now because I just previewed this post and dear lord it's pretty dense otherwise.
(04-23-2016, 12:17 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 11:16 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 09:34 PM)btp Wrote: »
This violated 1 and 2.
(04-22-2016, 10:03 PM)btp Wrote: »Any closer?
This violated 1 and 4.
Together, they violate 1, 4, and 5.
This post violates rules 1 and 4.
(04-23-2016, 12:22 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Here's something I just noticed about those Rule 1 posts.
All but one of them immediately followed a post (not counting Sruix's rule-checks_ that violated rules 1-4. This post is the only exception.
Maybe Rule 1 has something to do with the previous post?
This post violates rules 1, 4 and 5.
(04-23-2016, 12:29 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Okay. So I found several posts immediately following 1,2,3,4-breaking posts that still broke Rule 1. I guess that's a coincidence.
These are the posts, to be more specific:
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123225
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123247
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123230
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123275
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123281
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123286
This post violates rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »
Hell this is cumbersome hope it works.
Posts: 2,535
Joined: Aug 2011
Pronouns: eh
Location: seaside and spires
04-23-2016, 01:13 AM
(04-23-2016, 01:03 AM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?
This post violates rules 1, 2 and 5.
(04-23-2016, 01:05 AM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.
Is that difficult to check?*
Rule 3
Any closer?
This post violates rules 1, 2, 4 and 5.
(04-23-2016, 01:05 AM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.
Is that difficult to check?
Rule 3 ;)
Any closer?
This post violates rules 2 and 4.
(04-23-2016, 01:09 AM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.Is that difficult to check?Rule 3 ;) Any closer?
This post violates rules 2 and 4.
Posts: 2,535
Joined: Aug 2011
Pronouns: eh
Location: seaside and spires
04-23-2016, 01:18 AM
(04-23-2016, 01:13 AM)Granolaman Wrote: »
Show Content
Spoiler (04-23-2016, 12:39 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-23-2016, 12:34 AM)Sruixan Wrote: » (04-23-2016, 12:07 AM)Granolaman Wrote: »#125
(04-22-2016, 03:08 PM)btp Wrote: »
#144
(04-22-2016, 03:49 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?
#147
(04-22-2016, 04:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?
&
#154
#157
(04-22-2016, 07:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Thanks! I can't believe I misspelled Sruixan the first time!
#160
(04-22-2016, 07:27 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » g0m Sruixan
Only posts so far to pass Rule 1. Content doesn't appear to be the factor. Anyone see anything in the timestamps/post number?
Sruix isn't allowed to sleep til we solve this.
Also note Sruix lives in a different timezone than most of us.
This post violates rules 4 and 5.
I would also like you guys to solve this before I go to bed. Also, I'm writing this in purple now because I just previewed this post and dear lord it's pretty dense otherwise.
(04-23-2016, 12:17 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 11:16 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »This violated 1 and 2.
This violated 1 and 4.
Together, they violate 1, 4, and 5.
This post violates rules 1 and 4.
(04-23-2016, 12:22 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Here's something I just noticed about those Rule 1 posts.
All but one of them immediately followed a post (not counting Sruix's rule-checks_ that violated rules 1-4. This post is the only exception.
Maybe Rule 1 has something to do with the previous post?
This post violates rules 1, 4 and 5.
(04-23-2016, 12:29 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Okay. So I found several posts immediately following 1,2,3,4-breaking posts that still broke Rule 1. I guess that's a coincidence.
These are the posts, to be more specific:
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123225
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123247
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123230
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123275
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123281
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123286
This post violates rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »
Hell this is cumbersome hope it works.
This post violates rules 4 and 5, and the unwritten rule of not making me think that hard at a quarter past two in the morning.
Posts: 10,065
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
04-23-2016, 01:23 AM
Show Content
Spoiler (04-23-2016, 12:34 AM)Sruixan Wrote: » (04-23-2016, 12:07 AM)Granolaman Wrote: »#125
(04-22-2016, 03:08 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:03 PM)Sruixan Wrote: »...ah, balls to it. I'm procrastinating something fierce right now anyway.
This is post #1. It violates the following rules: 1, 2, 3 and 4.
#144
(04-22-2016, 03:49 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?
#147
(04-22-2016, 04:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?
&
#154
(04-22-2016, 06:58 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan Wrote:
#157
(04-22-2016, 07:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Thanks! I can't believe I misspelled Sruixan the first time!
#160
(04-22-2016, 07:27 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » g0m Sruixan
Only posts so far to pass Rule 1. Content doesn't appear to be the factor. Anyone see anything in the timestamps/post number?
Sruix isn't allowed to sleep til we solve this.
Also note Sruix lives in a different timezone than most of us.
This post violates rules 4 and 5.
I would also like you guys to solve this before I go to bed. Also, I'm writing this in purple now because I just previewed this post and dear lord it's pretty dense otherwise.
(04-23-2016, 12:17 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 11:16 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 09:34 PM)btp Wrote: »
This violated 1 and 2.
(04-22-2016, 10:03 PM)btp Wrote: »Any closer?
This violated 1 and 4.
Together, they violate 1, 4, and 5.
This post violates rules 1 and 4.
(04-23-2016, 12:22 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Here's something I just noticed about those Rule 1 posts.
All but one of them immediately followed a post (not counting Sruix's rule-checks_ that violated rules 1-4. This post is the only exception.
Maybe Rule 1 has something to do with the previous post?
This post violates rules 1, 4 and 5.
(04-23-2016, 12:29 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Okay. So I found several posts immediately following 1,2,3,4-breaking posts that still broke Rule 1. I guess that's a coincidence.
These are the posts, to be more specific:
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123225
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123247
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123230
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123275
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123281
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123286
This post violates rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
That's Post 201 again in the spoiler. Does this work? If it violates Rule 1 only, will it work if posted repeatedly?
Posts: 1,380
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Location: Wiscaaansin
04-23-2016, 01:23 AM
(04-22-2016, 03:13 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »::?
Posts: 2,535
Joined: Aug 2011
Pronouns: eh
Location: seaside and spires
04-23-2016, 01:30 AM
(04-23-2016, 01:23 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »
Show Content
Spoiler (04-23-2016, 12:34 AM)Sruixan Wrote: » (04-23-2016, 12:07 AM)Granolaman Wrote: »#125
(04-22-2016, 03:08 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:03 PM)Sruixan Wrote: »...ah, balls to it. I'm procrastinating something fierce right now anyway.
This is post #1. It violates the following rules: 1, 2, 3 and 4.
#144
(04-22-2016, 03:49 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?
#147
(04-22-2016, 04:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?
&
#154
(04-22-2016, 06:58 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan Wrote:
#157
(04-22-2016, 07:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Thanks! I can't believe I misspelled Sruixan the first time!
#160
(04-22-2016, 07:27 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » g0m Sruixan
Only posts so far to pass Rule 1. Content doesn't appear to be the factor. Anyone see anything in the timestamps/post number?
Sruix isn't allowed to sleep til we solve this.
Also note Sruix lives in a different timezone than most of us.
This post violates rules 4 and 5.
I would also like you guys to solve this before I go to bed. Also, I'm writing this in purple now because I just previewed this post and dear lord it's pretty dense otherwise.
(04-23-2016, 12:17 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 11:16 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 09:34 PM)btp Wrote: »
This violated 1 and 2.
(04-22-2016, 10:03 PM)btp Wrote: »Any closer?
This violated 1 and 4.
Together, they violate 1, 4, and 5.
This post violates rules 1 and 4.
(04-23-2016, 12:22 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Here's something I just noticed about those Rule 1 posts.
All but one of them immediately followed a post (not counting Sruix's rule-checks_ that violated rules 1-4. This post is the only exception.
Maybe Rule 1 has something to do with the previous post?
This post violates rules 1, 4 and 5.
(04-23-2016, 12:29 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Okay. So I found several posts immediately following 1,2,3,4-breaking posts that still broke Rule 1. I guess that's a coincidence.
These are the posts, to be more specific:
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123225
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123247
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123230
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123275
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123281
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123286
This post violates rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
That's Post 201 again in the spoiler. Does this work? If it violates Rule 1 only, will it work if posted repeatedly?
This post violates rules 4 and 5.
(04-23-2016, 01:23 AM)Granolaman Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:13 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »::?
This post violates rules 1 and 2.
Posts: 10,065
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
04-23-2016, 01:31 AM
(04-23-2016, 01:30 AM)Sruixan Wrote: »This post violates rules 1 and 2.
Or does it?
Posts: 10,065
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
04-23-2016, 01:32 AM
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »
?
Posts: 2,535
Joined: Aug 2011
Pronouns: eh
Location: seaside and spires
04-23-2016, 01:34 AM
(04-23-2016, 01:31 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-23-2016, 01:30 AM)Sruixan Wrote: »This post violates rules 1 and 2.
Or does it?
This post violates rules 2 and 4.
(04-23-2016, 01:32 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »
?
This post violates rules 1, 2 and 5.
Posts: 1,380
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Location: Wiscaaansin
04-23-2016, 01:39 AM
(04-23-2016, 01:23 AM)Granolaman Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:13 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »::??? I guess hyperlinking it wasn't enough so will #201 in spoilers work?
Show Content
Spoiler (04-23-2016, 12:39 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-23-2016, 12:34 AM)Sruixan Wrote: » (04-23-2016, 12:07 AM)Granolaman Wrote: »#125
(04-22-2016, 03:08 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:03 PM)Sruixan Wrote: »...ah, balls to it. I'm procrastinating something fierce right now anyway.
This is post #1. It violates the following rules: 1, 2, 3 and 4.
#144
(04-22-2016, 03:49 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?
#147
(04-22-2016, 04:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?
&
#154
(04-22-2016, 06:58 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan Wrote:
#157
(04-22-2016, 07:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Thanks! I can't believe I misspelled Sruixan the first time!
#160
(04-22-2016, 07:27 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » g0m Sruixan
Only posts so far to pass Rule 1. Content doesn't appear to be the factor. Anyone see anything in the timestamps/post number?
Sruix isn't allowed to sleep til we solve this.
Also note Sruix lives in a different timezone than most of us.
This post violates rules 4 and 5.
I would also like you guys to solve this before I go to bed. Also, I'm writing this in purple now because I just previewed this post and dear lord it's pretty dense otherwise.
(04-23-2016, 12:17 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 11:16 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 09:34 PM)btp Wrote: »
This violated 1 and 2.
(04-22-2016, 10:03 PM)btp Wrote: »Any closer?
This violated 1 and 4.
Together, they violate 1, 4, and 5.
This post violates rules 1 and 4.
(04-23-2016, 12:22 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Here's something I just noticed about those Rule 1 posts.
All but one of them immediately followed a post (not counting Sruix's rule-checks_ that violated rules 1-4. This post is the only exception.
Maybe Rule 1 has something to do with the previous post?
This post violates rules 1, 4 and 5.
(04-23-2016, 12:29 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Okay. So I found several posts immediately following 1,2,3,4-breaking posts that still broke Rule 1. I guess that's a coincidence.
These are the posts, to be more specific:
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123225
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123247
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123230
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123275
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123281
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123286
This post violates rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Posts: 1,380
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Location: Wiscaaansin
04-23-2016, 01:42 AM
(04-23-2016, 01:30 AM)Sruixan Wrote: » (04-23-2016, 01:23 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »
Show Content
Spoiler (04-23-2016, 12:34 AM)Sruixan Wrote: » (04-23-2016, 12:07 AM)Granolaman Wrote: »#125
(04-22-2016, 03:08 PM)btp Wrote: »
#144
(04-22-2016, 03:49 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?
#147
(04-22-2016, 04:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?
&
#154
#157
(04-22-2016, 07:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Thanks! I can't believe I misspelled Sruixan the first time!
#160
(04-22-2016, 07:27 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » g0m Sruixan
Only posts so far to pass Rule 1. Content doesn't appear to be the factor. Anyone see anything in the timestamps/post number?
Sruix isn't allowed to sleep til we solve this.
Also note Sruix lives in a different timezone than most of us.
This post violates rules 4 and 5.
I would also like you guys to solve this before I go to bed. Also, I'm writing this in purple now because I just previewed this post and dear lord it's pretty dense otherwise.
(04-23-2016, 12:17 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 11:16 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »This violated 1 and 2.
This violated 1 and 4.
Together, they violate 1, 4, and 5.
This post violates rules 1 and 4.
(04-23-2016, 12:22 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Here's something I just noticed about those Rule 1 posts.
All but one of them immediately followed a post (not counting Sruix's rule-checks_ that violated rules 1-4. This post is the only exception.
Maybe Rule 1 has something to do with the previous post?
This post violates rules 1, 4 and 5.
(04-23-2016, 12:29 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Okay. So I found several posts immediately following 1,2,3,4-breaking posts that still broke Rule 1. I guess that's a coincidence.
These are the posts, to be more specific:
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123225
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123247
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123230
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123275
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123281
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123286
This post violates rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
That's Post 201 again in the spoiler. Does this work? If it violates Rule 1 only, will it work if posted repeatedly?
This post violates rules 4 and 5.
(04-23-2016, 01:23 AM)Granolaman Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:13 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »::?
This post violates zero rules.
Posts: 2,535
Joined: Aug 2011
Pronouns: eh
Location: seaside and spires
04-23-2016, 01:46 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-23-2016, 01:48 AM by Sruixan.)
(04-23-2016, 01:39 AM)Granolaman Wrote: » (04-23-2016, 01:23 AM)Granolaman Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:13 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »::??? I guess hyperlinking it wasn't enough so will #201 in spoilers work?
Show Content
Spoiler (04-23-2016, 12:39 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-23-2016, 12:34 AM)Sruixan Wrote: » (04-23-2016, 12:07 AM)Granolaman Wrote: »#125
#144
#147
#154
#157
#160
Only posts so far to pass Rule 1. Content doesn't appear to be the factor. Anyone see anything in the timestamps/post number?
Sruix isn't allowed to sleep til we solve this.
Also note Sruix lives in a different timezone than most of us.
This post violates rules 4 and 5.
I would also like you guys to solve this before I go to bed. Also, I'm writing this in purple now because I just previewed this post and dear lord it's pretty dense otherwise.
(04-23-2016, 12:17 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »This violated 1 and 4.
Together, they violate 1, 4, and 5.
This post violates rules 1 and 4.
(04-23-2016, 12:22 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Here's something I just noticed about those Rule 1 posts.
All but one of them immediately followed a post (not counting Sruix's rule-checks_ that violated rules 1-4. This post is the only exception.
Maybe Rule 1 has something to do with the previous post?
This post violates rules 1, 4 and 5.
(04-23-2016, 12:29 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Okay. So I found several posts immediately following 1,2,3,4-breaking posts that still broke Rule 1. I guess that's a coincidence.
These are the posts, to be more specific:
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123225
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123247
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123230
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123275
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123281
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123286
This post violates rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
This post violates rules 4, 5, and the increasingly-not-unwritten rule again.
(04-23-2016, 01:42 AM)Granolaman Wrote: » (04-23-2016, 01:30 AM)Sruixan Wrote: » (04-23-2016, 01:23 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »
Show Content
Spoiler (04-23-2016, 12:34 AM)Sruixan Wrote: » (04-23-2016, 12:07 AM)Granolaman Wrote: »#125
#144
#147
#154
#157
#160
Only posts so far to pass Rule 1. Content doesn't appear to be the factor. Anyone see anything in the timestamps/post number?
Sruix isn't allowed to sleep til we solve this.
Also note Sruix lives in a different timezone than most of us.
This post violates rules 4 and 5.
I would also like you guys to solve this before I go to bed. Also, I'm writing this in purple now because I just previewed this post and dear lord it's pretty dense otherwise.
(04-23-2016, 12:17 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »This violated 1 and 4.
Together, they violate 1, 4, and 5.
This post violates rules 1 and 4.
(04-23-2016, 12:22 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Here's something I just noticed about those Rule 1 posts.
All but one of them immediately followed a post (not counting Sruix's rule-checks_ that violated rules 1-4. This post is the only exception.
Maybe Rule 1 has something to do with the previous post?
This post violates rules 1, 4 and 5.
(04-23-2016, 12:29 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Okay. So I found several posts immediately following 1,2,3,4-breaking posts that still broke Rule 1. I guess that's a coincidence.
These are the posts, to be more specific:
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123225
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123247
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123230
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123275
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123281
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123286
This post violates rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
That's Post 201 again in the spoiler. Does this work? If it violates Rule 1 only, will it work if posted repeatedly?
This post violates rules 4 and 5.
(04-23-2016, 01:23 AM)Granolaman Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:13 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »::?
This post violates zero rules.
This post violates rules 4 and, well, you know...
EDIT: also if you are editing the contents of these spoilers in any particularly subtle way then I am not aware of it and so my judgements are made accordingly
Posts: 10,065
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
04-23-2016, 01:47 AM
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »
I think having a question mark in a quote box breaks Rule 4. I don't claim to understand how.
?
Posts: 1,380
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Location: Wiscaaansin
04-23-2016, 01:50 AM
(04-22-2016, 03:13 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »Hey now, if you didn't want to read the same analysis post over and over then you shouldn't have declared it the least rule-breaky in the thread
Show Content
Spoiler (04-23-2016, 12:34 AM)Sruixan Wrote: » (04-23-2016, 12:07 AM)Granolaman Wrote: »#125
(04-22-2016, 03:08 PM)btp Wrote: »
#144
(04-22-2016, 03:49 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?
#147
(04-22-2016, 04:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?
&
#154
#157
(04-22-2016, 07:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Thanks! I can't believe I misspelled Sruixan the first time!
#160
(04-22-2016, 07:27 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » g0m Sruixan
Only posts so far to pass Rule 1. Content doesn't appear to be the factor. Anyone see anything in the timestamps/post number?
Sruix isn't allowed to sleep til we solve this.
Also note Sruix lives in a different timezone than most of us.
This post violates rules 4 and 5.
I would also like you guys to solve this before I go to bed. Also, I'm writing this in purple now because I just previewed this post and dear lord it's pretty dense otherwise.
(04-23-2016, 12:17 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 11:16 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »This violated 1 and 2.
This violated 1 and 4.
Together, they violate 1, 4, and 5.
This post violates rules 1 and 4.
(04-23-2016, 12:22 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Here's something I just noticed about those Rule 1 posts.
All but one of them immediately followed a post (not counting Sruix's rule-checks_ that violated rules 1-4. This post is the only exception.
Maybe Rule 1 has something to do with the previous post?
This post violates rules 1, 4 and 5.
(04-23-2016, 12:29 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Okay. So I found several posts immediately following 1,2,3,4-breaking posts that still broke Rule 1. I guess that's a coincidence.
These are the posts, to be more specific:
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123225
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123247
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123230
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123275
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123281
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123286
This post violates rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Posts: 1,380
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Location: Wiscaaansin
04-23-2016, 01:51 AM
(04-23-2016, 01:47 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »
I think having a question mark in a quote box breaks Rule 4? I don't claim to understand how.
?
Nah I got away with it in #214
Posts: 10,065
Joined: Jul 2011
Pronouns:
Location:
04-23-2016, 01:52 AM
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »
I think having a question mark in a quote box breaks Rule 4. I don't claim to understand how.
Here is Post 199 again with all question marks removed.
Show Content
Spoiler (04-23-2016, 12:34 AM)Sruixan Wrote: » (04-23-2016, 12:07 AM)Granolaman Wrote: »#125
(04-22-2016, 03:08 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:03 PM)Sruixan Wrote: »...ah, balls to it. I'm procrastinating something fierce right now anyway.
This is post #1. It violates the following rules: 1, 2, 3 and 4.
#144
(04-22-2016, 03:49 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert
#147
(04-22-2016, 04:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert
&
#154
(04-22-2016, 06:58 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan Wrote:
#157
(04-22-2016, 07:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Thanks! I can't believe I misspelled Sruixan the first time!
#160
(04-22-2016, 07:27 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » g0m Sruixan
Only posts so far to pass Rule 1. Content doesn't appear to be the factor. Anyone see anything in the timestamps/post number
Sruix isn't allowed to sleep til we solve this.
Also note Sruix lives in a different timezone than most of us.
This post violates rules 4 and 5.
I would also like you guys to solve this before I go to bed. Also, I'm writing this in purple now because I just previewed this post and dear lord it's pretty dense otherwise.
(04-23-2016, 12:17 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 11:16 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 09:34 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »
;)
This violated 1 and 2.
(04-22-2016, 10:03 PM)btp Wrote: » (04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.
Is that difficult to check*
Rule 3 ;)
Any closer
This violated 1 and 4.
Together, they violate 1, 4, and 5.
This post violates rules 1 and 4.
(04-23-2016, 12:22 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Here's something I just noticed about those Rule 1 posts.
All but one of them immediately followed a post (not counting Sruix's rule-checks_ that violated rules 1-4. This post is the only exception.
Maybe Rule 1 has something to do with the previous post?
This post violates rules 1, 4 and 5.
(04-23-2016, 12:29 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Okay. So I found several posts immediately following 1,2,3,4-breaking posts that still broke Rule 1. I guess that's a coincidence.
These are the posts, to be more specific:
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123225
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123247
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123230
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123275
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123281
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123286
This post violates rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
?
|