SCP-MAFIA -NIGHT 4 - ...again!? 10/21

your post was suspect because you went on about the night's results for a good three or four paragraphs, including the perennially scummy 'oh NO an INFO ROLE died whatever will the town do????' and 'oh man one scum down good job guys!'

as kieros pointed out your Felix vote wasn't amazing either, rounding out said post

Oh, I'm sorry. I wasn't aware that acknowledging events that happened in the night was scummy. I'll make it a point not to be pleased or disappointed ever in the future.

I will grant that, in retrospect, it's mostly empty talk. I just don't think empty talk is inherently scummy - it can be if that's all someone does for several days, of course. But since I don't think empty talk is inherently scummy, I have no particular reason to try to avoid it, regardless of which side I'm on.

Likewise, the Felix vote was really all I had at that point? "Everything that made me suspect him yesterday, plus the hammer thing, plus Sruix deflecting off him". I did stay on it all day, that was mostly because I was falling into full-on indifference right there. I mean, I barely cared about being voted until I realized just how little people were actually saying about why.

Pala, I am not going after you for role shenanigans but for not giving reasons. I probably would just be neutral on your piester confidence if you hadn't jumped on me without explanation as well.

"I see what you're getting at" is not a reason. Neither is a quote without any further explanation. Hell, "gut feeling" is more of a reason than either of those.

You are sticking your neck out ever-so-slightly further on piester now, though. I'm still not completely happy with your overall vagueness on both me and piester, but it's enough to suit me for the moment.

Unvote.

Mirdini's also given actual reasons now; I don't think they'd sway me if I was talking about someone else, but I can see why he's voting the way he is and I can deal with that.

So, who's left and actually saying things.

Myw, from what I can see, plays mostly the same way I tend to. Pretty noncommittal in general, but on the basis that it's hard to be really sure of any information. I'm not clearing him just because his playstyle meshes closely with mine, but it does mean I'm not going to indict him for the ways that it does. Neutral right now.

bigro is on the list of people who are suspicious of me without actual reasoning. Would like to hear what he has to say, even if it's just "gut feeling".

piester, really all I have is Pala's word to go on still? At the least I'd like a response from him on Pala's accusations - I mean, yes, he's going to claim vig if he's cactus killer or scum, but he could at least tell us who he targeted.

SupahKiven has done absolutely nothing but blatantly hop on the piester wagon. That's a thing.

I mentioned this before, but I'm more or less okay with Kieros right now; he was the first one to mention specifics in voting for me.

I think that covers everyone who's actually talked since this day got relatively active? Well, other than Walrus, but he's almost definitely hard-to-kill scum. At best he might be a hard-to-kill third-party.

Vote: SupahKiven

That's just blatant bandwagoning - it's entirely he hopes that the slow pace of the game will let it go through. I'd like at least one marginally substantial post from him.

bigro is second, but right now all I want from him is an explanation of why he finds me suspicious.