Post making contest 2.0

Post number 3730.
Post number 3730.
Post number 3730.

Post number 3730.
Post number 3730.
Post number 3730.
Post number 3730.
Post number 3730.
Post number 3730.
Post number 3730.

Post number 3730.
Post number 3730.
Post number 3730.

This post passes rule 3.

i hadn't thought that
_{i am trying this.}
i will hope

This post passes no rules.

This is update #71.

Given what Fogel has said about making "ridi

culous" posts, I've just applied some format

ting tags to this sentence in a completely haphazard fashion in a half-hearted attempt at co

ntribu

ting.

End of message.

This post passes no rules.

2 11 13 13

This post passes no rules.

2 11 13 13

This post passes no rules.

2 11 13 13

This post passes no rules.

SUPERFLOUS

1. W
   
2. e
   
3. L
   
4. c
   
5. O
   
6. m
   
7. E
   

Show Content

Spoiler

Show Content

Spoiler

Show Content

Spoiler

Show Content

Spoiler

Show Content

Spoileryo

Show Content

SpoilerThe bald eagle is noted for having flown with the heaviest load verified to be carried by any flying bird, since one eagle flew with a 6.8 kg (15 lb) mule deer fawn.[8] However, a few eagles may target prey considerably heavier than themselves; such prey is too heavy to fly with, thus it is either eaten at the site of the kill or taken in pieces back to a perch or nest. Golden and crowned eagles have killed ungulates weighing up to 30 kg (66 lb) and a martial eagle even killed a 37 kg (82 lb) duiker, 7–8 times heavier than the preying eagle.[7][9] Authors on birds David Allen Sibley, Pete Dunne, and Clay Sutton described the behavioral difference between hunting eagles and other birds of prey thus (in this case the bald and golden eagles as compared to other North American raptors):[10]

They have at least one singular characteristic. It has been observed that most birds of prey look back over their shoulders before striking prey (or shortly thereafter); predation is after all a two-edged sword. All hawks seem to have this habit, from the smallest kestrel to the largest Ferruginous – but not the Eagles.

Among the eagles are some of the largest birds of prey: only the condors and some of the Old World vultures are markedly larger. It is regularly debated which should be considered the largest species of eagle. They could be measured variously in total length, body mass, or wingspan. Different lifestyle needs among various eagles result in variable measurements from species to species. For example, many forest-dwelling eagles, including the very large harpy and Philippine eagles, have relatively short wingspans, a feature necessary for being able to maneuver in quick, short bursts through dense forested habitats.[7] Eagles in the genus Aquila, though found almost strictly in open country, are superlative soarers, and have relatively long wings for their size.[7]

These lists of the top five eagles are based on weight, length, and wingspan, respectively. Unless otherwise noted by reference, the figures listed are the median reported for each measurement in the guide Raptors of the World[11] in which only measurements that could be personally verified by the authors were listed.[7]

(This post was last modified: Tomorrow 19:91 DM by Harry Potter.)

This post passes rules 3 and 5.

This is update #72.

If CrimsonMage's post doesn't win then I don't know what will.



End of message.

This post passes no rules.

2 11 13 14

This post passes no rules.

Show Content

SpoilerSomething 3739 11!
, PLEASE?
Okay, let's quasigeostrophic things. With a weird dog, okay? yeS

This post passes rule 2.

nospace

This post passes no rules.

Books

####That is referred to in many circles as a book is an important endeavor to undertake, with the ultimate and final goal that would in such a circumstance be aimed for being to, in following, thusly produce an item of discussion, such that the topic of that category of items called “books” may be referred into circular circles of discussion wherein the topic of “books,” being discussed in such a way by those who would participate in the discussion of books, might foster discussion, and therefore lead, through the discussion of the subject material of that which is called by name “a book,” to a more developed discussion of books which may advance the discussion of books in such a way.
####Books, which are often the subject of many discussions in which the discussers of books may often discuss, often, the internal contents of the books which are discussed in the discussion, usually due to the cause that they are deserving of being discussed in such a discussion about books, as small mice and other small land animals are when an eagle gracefully swoops down from the sky to devour, giblets dripping from its cruelly bloodstained claws, small and utterly harmless, innocent land creatures for sustenance – indeed, the eagle, like the book which may be often seen in circular circles of book-related discussion, is a vicious animal that will never hit the bucket around a dead horse underneath a bush until it has devoured its worth of food, which in the case of the aforementioned book, may be compared to the paper on which books are printed, although the full comparison may extend to other substances such as ink, authorship, or book bindings.
####Usually the book in its natural habitat scrounges about vast savannahs, often being found within the confines of humanity which cultivates this unique crop with the shovels of printing and trowels of reading, harvesting this prowling creature for the sake of being discussed in discussion, poring desperately over pages, sometimes wrinkled, in search of the contents of books which come in the shape of aligned rows of mysteriously bent ink-splotches, which oftentimes may provide themselves either connectedly or disconnectedly to such an extent that insofar as they are found to such an extent, provide difficulty to those humans who pore desperately over pages, sometimes wrinkled, in their discussion of books within aforementioned circular circles of discussion.
####Ultimately in the ultimate finality of the following end, coming to the only conclusion that may be retrieved from such a discussion of books with pages, sometimes wrinkled, on which may be found mysterious remnants of ink arranged into discrete shapes, within the confines of circular circles of discussion in which the subject matter usually includes books, we must decide finally that the conclusion is readily apparent and obvious, as clear as a freshly-minted wine bottle, and thusly decide after much deliberation and decision-making that this was decided to become the concluding decision on books.

This post passes no rules.

I'M NOT A MATHS I DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS

The first post (counting from the beginning of the thread) would have to follow rule 1 of set 2 (R1S2), R2S3, R3S4, R4S5, and R5S6. The second post had to follow R1S3, R2S5, R3S7, R4S9, R5S11. Going forward, the fifth post had to follow R1S6, R2S11, R2S16, R4S21, and R5S26 26-23=3 so R5S3.

And then to be annoying, the 24th post should have been the same as the first, but Akumu screwed things up so it follows R2S4 instead of R2S3. And then kept adding one every 23 posts to that.

So then the 530th should have been the same as the first, so Akumu screwed it up to need R3S5, and kept adding one to that every 529 posts.

Technically, it went on further, but there wasn't 12167 posts so we didn't have to deal with that.

This post passes no rules.

I'M NOT A MATHS I DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS

The first post (counting from the beginning of the thread) would have to follow rule 1 of set 2 (R1S2), R2S3, R3S4, R4S5, and R5S6. The second post had to follow R1S3, R2S5, R3S7, R4S9, R5S11. Going forward, the fifth post had to follow R1S6, R2S11, R2S16, R4S21, and R5S26 26-23=3 so R5S3.

And then to be annoying, the 24th post should have been the same as the first, but Akumu screwed things up so it follows R2S4 instead of R2S3. And then kept adding one every 23 posts to that.

So then the 530th should have been the same as the first, so Akumu screwed it up to need R3S5, and kept adding one to that every 529 posts.

Technically, it went on further, but there wasn't 12167 posts so we didn't have to deal with that.

This post passes no rules.

I'M NOT A MATHS I DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS

The first post (counting from the beginning of the thread) would have to follow rule 1 of set 2 (R1S2), R2S3, R3S4, R4S5, and R5S6. The second post had to follow R1S3, R2S5, R3S7, R4S9, R5S11. Going forward, the fifth post had to follow R1S6, R2S11, R2S16, R4S21, and R5S26 26-23=3 so R5S3.

And then to be annoying, the 24th post should have been the same as the first, but Akumu screwed things up so it follows R2S4 instead of R2S3. And then kept adding one every 23 posts to that.

So then the 530th should have been the same as the first, so Akumu screwed it up to need R3S5, and kept adding one to that every 529 posts.

Technically, it went on further, but there wasn't 12167 posts so we didn't have to deal with that.

This post passes no rules.

I'M NOT A MATHS I DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS

The first post (counting from the beginning of the thread) would have to follow rule 1 of set 2 (R1S2), R2S3, R3S4, R4S5, and R5S6. The second post had to follow R1S3, R2S5, R3S7, R4S9, R5S11. Going forward, the fifth post had to follow R1S6, R2S11, R2S16, R4S21, and R5S26 26-23=3 so R5S3.

And then to be annoying, the 24th post should have been the same as the first, but Akumu screwed things up so it follows R2S4 instead of R2S3. And then kept adding one every 23 posts to that.

So then the 530th should have been the same as the first, so Akumu screwed it up to need R3S5, and kept adding one to that every 529 posts.

Technically, it went on further, but there wasn't 12167 posts so we didn't have to deal with that.

This post passes no rules.

If I missed any posts while going through that, I'll get to them in a new post. Edit: Oh hey, I didn't!