+iny ©at people

We can't realistically win the whole game in this one singular dialogue.

Any sort of threat or 'play' towards Grind is going to make this worse for now. I like plans that involve asking more questions, not plans that involve trying to persuade/out-maneuver Grind in a way that cinches us a win-- because it really seems like that's just going to fall on its face, just like most of our plans.

I'm relatively alright with Wheat's first suggestion, but the annendum should be nixed, I feel. Accusing Grind of being 'morally dodgy' is a great way to get hung up on again.