Subforum Ideas Topic: The Quorum Quorner

I'm in favor of Proposition: Wheatspace

i'll vote against it if gatr says they don't want it locked

Oh uh...proposition bulbasaur is for the Least Forgotten Pokemon thread.

Gatr's thread would be proposition croagunk aka Prop. NEVERFORGET

Yes, my vote was against Proposition: Bulbasaur

I'll remain neutral on Proposition: NEVERFORGET

I like this thread. It feels like nomic, but for keeps.

"If you vote in the game, you vote for real!"

Yes on Bulbasaur and Wheatspace
Nay on lockpick. I like the idea of being able to lock certain threads, but I'm afraid it could stifle necromancy and suppress creative spam.

You must be registered to view this content.

Yes on wheat challenge

Yes on Wheat Challenge

i am in flavour of wheat challenge

That makes 7 votes in under 24 hours for proposition Wheat challenge.

Since the proposal was framed as Wheat giving himself the challenge, I think that he gets to determine the exact conditions and stipulations the challenge will occur under.

Also 5 votes in favor of BULBASAUR and 2 votes against

And 6 votes in favor of Lockpick and 1 vote against

I STRONGLY DISLIKE THE QUORUM RULES THE QUOTA IS TOO BIG I WILL OVERTHROW YOU WHEAT

ALSO NO THAT IS NOT CLEAR THE RULES ARE CONFUSING AND STUPID I HATE THEM

EVEN WORSE THAN A CAUCUS: QUORUMS

Yes on Lockpick, Wheat Challenge, Bulbasaur and Croagunk

HOW ABOUT WE PUT THE QUORUM SYSTEM UP TO A QUORUM (THIS IS HOW SPACE ALIENS SAY VOTE)

PROPOSITION: LOATHER WRITES THE NEW VOTING RULES, AND THEY ARE PERFECT, AND GOOD, AND LOVED BY ALL

(AFTER USING ALLCAPS FOR SEVERAL POSTS IT FEELS WEIRD TO SUDDENLY JUST STOP SO I'LL WAIT A BIT FIRST)

i am done using allcaps now it was fun

Yes on Lockpick, Wheat Challenge, Bulbasaur and Croagunk

Flying in form afar to further the cause of democracy, It's GRANOLAMAN!
Dashing and bold, our hero lends his support to all causes in need of assistance.

With decisive action, he opens the quorum on Wheat Challenge. But what's this? All of the votes on the Wheat Challenge are in favor of the proposal! The countdown is ticking. In 24 hours, Loather's dark horse mandate will pass unanimously! Will Granolaman's justice prevail? Will the lurkers toss a wrench in his plans? And what role does the fabled PHARMDRUGS have to play in all this?

Find out next time on: Quorum Quorner! (sponsored by lorazepam)\


Edit: Egad! Speed posted by the meticulous and diligent Wheat!

i'll vote against it if gatr says they don't want it locked

I vote against it. It would be much neater to lock it and delete all posts after the victory post. For dramatic effect, you understand.

e: i do wish that username mentions would ping me here. kinda like what i saw on another forum with @Gatr and suchlike.

@Gatr *ping!*

I would suggest that the real dramatic effect of the thread comes from the joyous cries of victory from all those involved. If we deleted their posts, we would be wiping their contributions from the forum!

Of course...really with this going in conjunction with Lockpick, I guess the point is kind of moot.

n07 4n 4bu53r 0f p0w3r 4t 411 give me the pharmdrugs password

I'm dropping Proposition: Croagunk because it's my thread

That being said though, I am in favor of Proposition: Lockpick

And I propose Proposition: Ping-Pong which would allow for rudimentary exploration into a ping system by the people who are knowledgeable in the ways of the forum.

here is my quorum rules proposal: everything that gets proposed can immediately be voted for or against, and whichever way has more votes after a week decides whether the proposal is passed. also the proposal itself counts as a vote, so if someone proposes something and nobody else votes, it passes

You must be registered to view this content.

You must be registered to view this content.

i'm in favor of just reducing it to 7, though i think having it be even lower would mean more Democratic Activity