RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-29-2016, 12:29 AM
You must be registered to view this content.
dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
|
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-29-2016, 12:29 AM
You must be registered to view this content.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-29-2016, 04:56 AM
WOAH LOOK AT ALL THESE SHINY NEW RULES
Here were them counts.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-29-2016, 05:22 AM
THAT'S PRETTY AWESOME BUT CAN YOU ADD THE WORDING OF THE PROP TO NOTES ATTACHED TO THEIR NAMES? I WANNA VOTE ON SOME OF THESE BUT I'M TOO LAZY TO TRAWL THROUGH ALL THESE TYPING QUIRKS TO FIND THEM
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-29-2016, 05:10 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-29-2016, 05:11 PM by a52.)
ye2 on liineup
prop grammer: all users must refer to them2elve2 iin the thiird per2on prop lapd: "poliice offiicer2" can be elected that are authoriized to deliiver punii2hment2 to rule-breaker2, but are otherwii2e the 2ame a2 ordiinary u2er2. (ii've changed back two 2ollux 2o that people can read my propo2iitiion2)
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-29-2016, 05:14 PM
You must be registered to view this content.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-29-2016, 05:35 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-29-2016, 05:36 PM by SleepingOrange.)
No on grammar
Yes on lap8===D
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-29-2016, 05:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-29-2016, 05:51 PM by a52.)
two btp tiicket2 on grammar
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-29-2016, 05:58 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-29-2016, 05:58 PM by Jacquerel.)
no on grammer
i still havent chosen a typing quirk but i'll get around to it
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-29-2016, 07:48 PM
You must be registered to view this content.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-29-2016, 07:59 PM
OTTO Wrote:(04-29-2016, 05:51 PM)a52 Wrote: »two btp tiicket2 on grammarContent Removed By user let the pant2 2ock2 deciide
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-29-2016, 09:03 PM
[Chwoka]: The recipient of a [username] TICKET may redeem one Ticket for one YES vote on any proposition.
[Chwoka]: A YES vote created by a redeemed [username] TICKET counts as one YES vote by [username]. [Jacquerel]: Seems pretty clear cut to me. [Jacquerel]: It counts as much as me voting yes twice for something would, that meaning... once. [Jacquerel]: Also I'm changing my vote to Yes on Grammer because of my new typing quirk.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-29-2016, 10:27 PM
ProPoSiTion GarMents Squared: Pants Is StricKen From Rule 6 As Well And RePlaced With Socks
signature
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-29-2016, 10:53 PM
SCANDAL!
bigro: not a rule bigro is a rule through. Edit: After reviewing the current propositions it has been determined that PROP 9: MOVE LOATHER DATE SIM TO IMPORTANT THREADS has received 3 votes and is awaiting action.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-29-2016, 11:03 PM
prop mily: i am subhuman and unable to vote
yes on mily
did you know that i'm really just an excuse to make the adventure look amateur and bad??? because that's not true it's just that i forgot the whole point of doing this. - orangeaipom
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-29-2016, 11:10 PM
(04-29-2016, 11:03 PM)Farewell Wrote: »prop mily: i am subhuman and unable to vote yes on mily. MILY PASSES. FAREWELL IS UNABLE TO VOTE.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-29-2016, 11:15 PM
OTTO Wrote:(04-29-2016, 05:51 PM)a52 Wrote: »two btp tiicket2 on grammarContent Removed By user I'm not the socks but yes, you used your 2 btp tickets to make me vote yes twice on prop grammar. No refunds! Easy mistake, though. Edit: So here are two more.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-29-2016, 11:44 PM
[Jacquerel]: I'm voting yes on TICKETS to further cement its legality.
[Jacquerel]: And absolutely not for any bribery or voter fraud related reasons.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-30-2016, 01:11 AM
You must be registered to view this content.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-30-2016, 01:13 AM
You must be registered to view this content.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-30-2016, 01:24 AM
[Jacquerel]: Reviewing rules I think are useful to have and shouldn't be repealed I'm also throwing a protective Yes on Effort.
[Jacquerel]: Needs to be some encouragement for people to make topics other than this one really. >> To [ ]: Also while it's a good idea to practice I guess, I don't think the third person rule is in the rules topic yet, so it's not yet technically in practice.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-30-2016, 01:25 AM
[Jacquerel]: Whoop never mind, it's in there now. I guess that Jacquerel was just slightly too slow.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-30-2016, 01:27 AM
Just a reminder, all rules are still propositions that can be voted yea or nay on. If a rule drops below 3 total, it is removed from the ruleset.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-30-2016, 01:47 AM
no on lineup, my connection is too poor to see it
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition
04-30-2016, 01:52 AM
Quote:beestpand that is what btp did. no on lineup but btp will try and keep the spreadsheet updated regardless |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|