The Wander Island Incident - Night Four - Five For One [13/21]

The obvious answer is LegendaryQ, as what appears to be a target of heavy suspicion; having a clearer read on whether or not hunches are Just That or collusion with an enemy could potentially create branching logic paths from which to proceed-- but I almost feel like that's too obvious, and could be used as a smokescreen by those who... would, uh. do that. yes.

A perhaps better answer, then, is one who's been relatively active in discussions but has otherwise managed to avoid the bead of scrutiny, which may get us slightly farther than directly reinforcing or refuting analysis that has already been performed. Don't have anyone in particular in mind, though.

It would also be good to know, supposing the existence of some hypothetical detectives, what of flavor detective they are (supposing non-standard detectives are A Thing in this setup), but the only conclusive ways I can think to test that is to reveal the alignment of someone who later dies, which isn't helpful in the short-term, or to have my own alignment revealed, which only enlightens me. Unless I claim, but would only open more cans of worms, and I refuse to rise to the bait.

Yeah NTA's a good lynch. Volunteering an answer was something I liked but ultimately they don't say anything and the whole thing still reads with that taste of over-awareness.

Don't think I can endorse numbers as town hard enough especially after their comment that they read the guide several times. Play feels like naturally tentative towny, the pharmacy interaction is too strange for scum. Like what's happening there, come up with a super weak reason to join a lynch that numbers promptly leaves soon after? Versus actually being curious what sai was up to and getting their answer. Town.

Sai mostly reads like a Good Player with the caveats that comes with but lean town because of this:

Show Content

Spoiler

I'm Certified Part Of The Problem™ and I second this motion

Hi. Have you caught up with the actual infiltrator-hunting posts?

@Sai:

Thoughts on my earlier reyweld thing from these?

When you say 'town blind' did you mean 'townie because they're blind to things' or 'leaning town but, I'm still blind to their orientation?' I also lean town on Rey because I think that they're both proactively engaged and I think that their reasoning in the post you quoted was actually, well, reasoned as to 'why would someone do this' rather than 'should I or should I not try to get this duder lynched.'

I don't necessarily follow what you were saying, though. If you were saying scum wouldn't want one of their own to be wagoned who wasn't currently being voted for, then it doesn't really help them much to try to make yet another divergent wagon more viable rather than encourage one of the already larger ones.

Or, actually, I think I get it now. You're saying that Reyweld not factoring in the possibility that one of the two existing wagons was already scum and that numbers would have wanted to divert the lynch from a potential teammate is something that only town would do, because scum would be more conscientious about the possibility of diverting a lynch from a teammate, right? I don't actually agree with the reasoning (if that is the argument), because scum could also just as easily know that both wagons are town and therefore not think of that as being a reason to try to push another lynch.

The confusion+workthrough feels town. It's something I /have/ seen scum fake before but it's a very effort intensive style that I don't think is the first place scum would go with in this game and especially on day one.

Also a minor thing but their don't townread me/pharmacy comment feels unnecessary for scum.

Pilot: vOv