The Wander Island Incident - Night Four - Five For One [13/21]

I'm Certified Part Of The Problem™ and I second this motion

Hi. Have you caught up with the actual infiltrator-hunting posts?

@Sai:

Thoughts on my earlier reyweld thing from these?

When you say 'town blind' did you mean 'townie because they're blind to things' or 'leaning town but, I'm still blind to their orientation?' I also lean town on Rey because I think that they're both proactively engaged and I think that their reasoning in the post you quoted was actually, well, reasoned as to 'why would someone do this' rather than 'should I or should I not try to get this duder lynched.'

I don't necessarily follow what you were saying, though. If you were saying scum wouldn't want one of their own to be wagoned who wasn't currently being voted for, then it doesn't really help them much to try to make yet another divergent wagon more viable rather than encourage one of the already larger ones.

Or, actually, I think I get it now. You're saying that Reyweld not factoring in the possibility that one of the two existing wagons was already scum and that numbers would have wanted to divert the lynch from a potential teammate is something that only town would do, because scum would be more conscientious about the possibility of diverting a lynch from a teammate, right? I don't actually agree with the reasoning (if that is the argument), because scum could also just as easily know that both wagons are town and therefore not think of that as being a reason to try to push another lynch.