Application review and appreciation topic + Lore Q&A

What are your thoughts on an article that's been partially censored due to pressure from a third party while the results of a lawsuit are settled? Here's a bit of the article as an example.

Show Content

Spoiler

Subspecies
[C75-B]:
The shimic was not always the way it is now. Shimics used to be called the now decommissioned [C75-B] and were a new product from [C75-B] intended to expedite the repair of a ships electrical system by removing the need to buy and locate replacement parts. However due to an oversite on the part of [C75-B] when creating [C75-B] and cross contamination with a biological parasite the shimic was created.

Trivia
Some parts of this article have been omitted or outright removed per request due to agreement C75-B. These changes may be reverted pending the outcome of the class action lawsuit “[C75-B] v. Ship Owners”. Any such removed sections are marked with [C75-B].

It should be noted I do have an uncensored version as well, there's nothing to exciting behind the removed portions. Mainly just the companies name / parts pointing out how little care the company in question put into making this product that has now become a large issue. The parts a shady company currently going through a lawsuit wouldn't want to be public knowledge.

I guess my main question is would an article like this be allowed?