Nostalgfia - GAME OVER SCUM WIN

I'm not trying to word flip-flop, you're just reading too much :P

3 items; 1 recipe and 2 probably-junk-but-they-haven't-been-added-to-the-database.

Reading over the last few days, it's easy to spot granolaman's posts against me, constantly fishing for reads on me since I voted them briefly on day 1. I'm not sure you read back all the way, but that pattern's pretty clear. I don't know what to make of their mix-up with wheat (claimed thief, possibly town?), pharmacy and cat, with the latter being really really mum about exactly what they were up to that whole time.
Since this:

Cat, Pharmacy, Wheat, tell me exactly why you all visited the same person last night.

All we've had is this:

hey doggie I got a real simple question for you

did anything bad happen to you last night?

cause I'd really like to vote pharms but if nothing bad happened to you it makes me doubt that vote

Yeah, my info. I'm trying to re-clarify item info because there's a distinct chance I was not actually stolen from so much as, uh,

something else happened

Something else happened.

none of you are right do you just want me to say it so we can move past this

Schaz you got stuff in return, didn't you?

I got stuff in the night and refuse to quantify whether said stuff comprises a fair exchange.

Wheat'll probably agree with me when I say that my stuff probably should've stayed with me instead of getting flung around all over the shit show.

why can you not say yes or no and just get what I'm saying

That's an awful lot of nothing posts and ooh ahhing and not a lot of definitive answers.
I don't think all of them are scum, but what's the odds of three town roles colliding on the same person in one night after a d1 gun claim? You know, the one granola boy started raging over when I made sure he didn't sweep it under the table. What I'm saying is, there's some quality misdirection going on that I'm not happy with but I can tolerate if it brings up better scum reads.