proof

Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
proof
#2
RE: proof
I probably don't know enough about primes, but,

What properties/laws are you using that makes N prime?

Have you also considered that, under the number system that allows infinite digit integers, since [...11111] is the largest number, there must also be a largest prime number?

If we constructed a table in that method that contains n primes, the resulting N has m digits. Surely there exists some n that produces a table that contains a number larger than N, if not containing N outright. The table that we used with n = infinity produces some prime N with some m digits; m in this case is presumably infinity. Does our infinite list contain a number larger than N? Which infinite value has more "infinite-ness", n or m?
[Image: tN4CQnw.png][Image: 6miAxpY.png][Image: xrt4V73.png]
[Image: LAbvoew.png][Image: kHYNSyp.png][Image: 2xEY8jD.png]


Messages In This Thread
proof - by a52 - 03-09-2017, 05:41 AM
RE: proof - by Justice Watch - 03-10-2017, 05:47 AM
RE: p - by btp - 03-10-2017, 06:24 AM
RE: proof - by Dragon Fogel - 03-10-2017, 06:40 AM
RE: proof - by btp - 03-10-2017, 07:00 AM
RE: proof - by Justice Watch - 03-10-2017, 07:45 AM
RE: proof - by Dragon Fogel - 03-10-2017, 11:07 PM
RE: proof - by a52 - 03-11-2017, 01:08 AM
RE: proof - by qwerx3 - 03-11-2017, 01:09 AM
RE: proof - by SC - 03-11-2017, 07:33 PM
RE: proof - by Dragon Fogel - 03-11-2017, 07:39 PM
RE: proof - by SC - 03-11-2017, 07:42 PM
RE: proof - by Dragon Fogel - 03-11-2017, 08:29 PM
RE: proof - by Justice Watch - 03-11-2017, 09:46 PM
RE: proof - by Reyweld - 03-12-2017, 12:33 AM
RE: proof - by a52 - 03-12-2017, 01:11 AM
RE: proof - by SC - 03-12-2017, 04:36 AM