diet subforum ideas topic classic

Specific Rollback Rider VVa9 Vote Status

In Favor

Wheat (#139)
Schazer (#140)
Chwoka (#141)
ICan'tGiveCredit (#142)
Reyweld (#143)
Jacquerel (#149)
Kieros (#150)
Mirdini (#160)

That's 8 votes i.e. quorum, I guess we move to ~phase 2~

YES ON VVa9

In addition to the above quorumgoers who all voted In favour eventually:
Shredded voted in favour provided the nature of challenges is not settled until after Popping and Locking.

Yooo so as per our existing subforum laws, it's almost been a week since we reached quorum on SSR VVa9 aka "does Bigro have to earn his posts in that one thread."

We are also I guess for convenience's sake voting on whether to make a new thread to handle subforum lawlayery, to which Wheat proposed these rules:

a. Voting will be open for week from post, unless an option has <85% of a vote (of at least 7 votes) after a day, in which case QUICK MOVEMENT status will be bestowed upon it"
b. A mechanism will be designed so that, with a smaller 3 vote quorum, pharmdrugs may be authorized to move things from the active SUBFORUM IDEAS TOPIC into a designated dumping grounds thread. After Quorum is established, as long as no one has any good reason to oppose the thing being moved after a week of consideration, it'll be done.

(currently, voting will be open for a week, so we'll have to spend a week waiting)

Mirdini, Wheat, Chwoka, Schazer, and Reyweld vote In favour of a New Thread.
Credit votes In favour, provided quorum quantity is discussed (possibly to scale with the size of the userbase?)

The one-week deadline is still four hours away but this is how things are lined up now:

• VVa9 will pass, with the following amendments that I assume will happen because nobody objected:
  • If bigro ends up not forcing a pop and lock, one may be forced after an unspecified period of inactivity. (The Gripes of Scrazth)
    
  • If anyone exceeds over 300 posts in bigro's thread, they are subject to the same process of judgement as bigro to keep those posts. (Bigro's Amendment)
• A new thread will be created with the rules Wheat listed in that post I quoted earlier.
  • Possible amendment of necessary quorum to be discussed
    
  • (Personal addition by me because I dunno what people's thoughts are on it) Posts are snipped out of this bad thread and transferred to the new one, for archival purposes and also so this one sinks into the threadmire