RE: Murder By The Book - Day 8: The Seven Habits Of Highly Dead People
06-01-2014, 01:35 AM
SCHAZER DID YOU REALLY
DID YOU REALLY HAVE THAT ICON WHILE
oh my god you must have just been cackling. you monster
im screaming
personally I wouldn't have mentioned if there were zero protect roles bc like then there would have been no hesitation on shooting donut the night after he claimed, but idk
either way garuru was continuing to be cagey about /something/ even after donut revealed so like...there had to be a pr out there unaccounted for, and in the absence of any other claims a doctor makes sense? esp. since with a maf busdriver and no nonscum killing roles other than the long-dead 3ps a scum doc is really unlikely
obviously a fakeclaim like this would be quite in the spirit of mylo for scum, but personally I believe schazer because it clicks with garuru's continued secrecy? unless someone thinks it was something else vOv
it does make me confused about that defense of pala tho like. still wondering where you're getting "2 scum should rush a lynch at h-3" from
anyways which do you think is likelier:
-one of schazer and pala is scum
-scum has a lawyer and guessed donut's checks right twice
-scum has two godfathers
because uh
DID YOU REALLY HAVE THAT ICON WHILE
oh my god you must have just been cackling. you monster
im screaming
personally I wouldn't have mentioned if there were zero protect roles bc like then there would have been no hesitation on shooting donut the night after he claimed, but idk
either way garuru was continuing to be cagey about /something/ even after donut revealed so like...there had to be a pr out there unaccounted for, and in the absence of any other claims a doctor makes sense? esp. since with a maf busdriver and no nonscum killing roles other than the long-dead 3ps a scum doc is really unlikely
obviously a fakeclaim like this would be quite in the spirit of mylo for scum, but personally I believe schazer because it clicks with garuru's continued secrecy? unless someone thinks it was something else vOv
it does make me confused about that defense of pala tho like. still wondering where you're getting "2 scum should rush a lynch at h-3" from
anyways which do you think is likelier:
-one of schazer and pala is scum
-scum has a lawyer and guessed donut's checks right twice
-scum has two godfathers
because uh