Murder By The Book - Ender's Game

We haven't lynched a protective role yet, so it's not unreasonable for Undercover to consider the odds of there being one and go for a safer night-kill. There's power roles still in play that don't have a huge sign for "doc me" over their heads.

Why pick seedy? I don't really know. Might have just been a shot in the dark, might have been because seedy was onto something.
(A couple of Seedy's recent posts:)

Show Content

Spoiler

-#822-
If Truegreen is scum (they are) Schaz is unlikely to be Undercover.
"I agree that some of the people making claims right now are also some of the more scummy elements. but I'd prefer to try and catch them in lies than risk lynching power roles off the bat."
Gnauga is sorta warning bells

-#768-
There are legitimate reasons to suspect Schazer (but TG hit none of them)
Palamedes seems less suspicious because of the pie they threw at Sotek
Vote Eberron

'course, then we run into a buncha potential wine (but maybe mafia knows that we'll think that, so they flipped it so we'd think...) and it's not a very compelling argument. Another reason might be that Seedy was pretty spot-on with Truegreen, picking him out on largely based on scum tells, and that's kinda intimidating to Undercover. Of course, Truegreen wasn't really playing as cautiously as they could have.

actually on that note um vote gnauga because fillerpost at day end and he contributed a nailincoffin vote with 6 hours left which is sort of just like a "well throw in towel rip scumbuddy"

I was fillerposting because I was busy IRL but trying to be at least marginally helpful in-game given that I felt guilty about not really doing enough useful things D4, so I threw in a quick votal and a quick link to donut's cop-claim because nobody else was. Sorry.
Nail in coffin was on a whim. I was waiting around for any last reads or words people wanted to get in but it looked like folks were done and I've never hammered before! I don't really have a better reason than that.