RE: Murder By The Book - Day 4: Life of Pie
04-26-2014, 05:32 AM
@Seedy
yeah you are partially right about my suspicions of Schazer. Some of it is based on my previous understanding of the Slorange and Schazer relationship along with the arguments I had with Schazer early on. You could indeed say I'm guilty of some dogmatic reasoning.
The biggest problem is perhaps that I'm a bit too lazy right now to go through the trouble of reading the backlog of her posts. I reviewed some of the ones I remembered, particularly the arguments about mechanics and the specific post I mentioned in my claim against her. This is where most of my actual evidence SHOULD BE and I'm confident there is stuff there, just not motivated to look very closely right now.(sorry about the pronouns thing. I usually try to avoid pronoun shenanigans by using neutral pronouns but It's been a long day and my writing has been a bit patchy).
But I was willing to let both of these things slide for a time. That was until that weird vote at the beginning of the day. It could be the accumulated poor reputation I have managed to grow, but I feel it might be something else.
Maybe using the word 'conspiracy' was confusing or maybe I just didn't explain my thoughts well enough, the 'conspiracy' wording was really mostly a joke on my character's flavor as a rather paranoid conspiracy nut. In truth my thoughts ran more like this.
1. Undercover kills Slorange
2. One (or very few) members target me early on hoping to incite a strong response based on my turbulent relations with Slorange.
3. someone (hopefully town) presents an actual claim to support Lynch.
4. Support Grows
5. I die
Basically, I'm viewed as an easy target, especially after Slorange dies.
In my mind Whimbrel sits as 'maybe scum' mostly because that's my baseline as far as reads go. The unsupported early vote thing is kind of weird, but understandable as a new player and he really hasn't done enough to get any read off of him. For Schazer however such a move is very curious indeed, thus leading me to bring my suspicions to light.
yeah you are partially right about my suspicions of Schazer. Some of it is based on my previous understanding of the Slorange and Schazer relationship along with the arguments I had with Schazer early on. You could indeed say I'm guilty of some dogmatic reasoning.
The biggest problem is perhaps that I'm a bit too lazy right now to go through the trouble of reading the backlog of her posts. I reviewed some of the ones I remembered, particularly the arguments about mechanics and the specific post I mentioned in my claim against her. This is where most of my actual evidence SHOULD BE and I'm confident there is stuff there, just not motivated to look very closely right now.(sorry about the pronouns thing. I usually try to avoid pronoun shenanigans by using neutral pronouns but It's been a long day and my writing has been a bit patchy).
But I was willing to let both of these things slide for a time. That was until that weird vote at the beginning of the day. It could be the accumulated poor reputation I have managed to grow, but I feel it might be something else.
Maybe using the word 'conspiracy' was confusing or maybe I just didn't explain my thoughts well enough, the 'conspiracy' wording was really mostly a joke on my character's flavor as a rather paranoid conspiracy nut. In truth my thoughts ran more like this.
1. Undercover kills Slorange
2. One (or very few) members target me early on hoping to incite a strong response based on my turbulent relations with Slorange.
3. someone (hopefully town) presents an actual claim to support Lynch.
4. Support Grows
5. I die
Basically, I'm viewed as an easy target, especially after Slorange dies.
In my mind Whimbrel sits as 'maybe scum' mostly because that's my baseline as far as reads go. The unsupported early vote thing is kind of weird, but understandable as a new player and he really hasn't done enough to get any read off of him. For Schazer however such a move is very curious indeed, thus leading me to bring my suspicions to light.