RE: Murder By The Book - Day 4: Life of Pie
04-26-2014, 04:30 AM
truegreen I feel suspicious of schazer but I don't like the way you're essentially bridging off of your previous dogmatic suspicion of slorange onto her. it feels less like a good lynch and more like sloppy reasoning because you're unwilling to fully give up your previous doubts.
that said:
a) it's rather a STRETCH to say that there would be an undercover conspiracy to "frame" you. you've acted very scummily and most of the points brought against you are legitimate. the only iffy thing would be people going entirely off of this recent pie stuff to accuse you. you hardly need a CONSPIRACY to lynch someone who tried to get a townie for 2 straight days.
b) IF there was a conspiracy, NOT ALL OF UNDERCOVER WOULD BE PUSHING IT. a fundamental thing of scumplay is that you don't all tie yourselves to one horse. it's pretty unlikely that schaz and whim are both scum. btw referring to schazer with he/him pronouns makes your posts really confusing to read
idk there's legit reasons to lynch schazer I just don't think you've arrived at lynching her through those legit reasons. I'd really appreciate seeing less tunnelvision from you, especially after you supposedly learned your lesson from slorange's flip.
....huh. mm. well alright I guess pala and fogel have cleared some things up...
pala seems better to me too because I think "I have this pie what I don't know things do" makes sotek a pretty solid choice. I'm tentatively trusting of this whole daycoppy biz. :s
also hey garuru I actually voted truegreen a few realtime days ago but it isn't showing up in the votals?
pala I think your logic about truegreen is a bit iffy? I could see scum having at least one vanilla. otoh they probably have some real-ass power roles to counter 3p team and town inventor. I'm worried just thinking about it
but I don't think garuru's infoblast counted enough moving parts to account for all the scum? assuming we can trust him, which the fact that he hasn't commented on your theory despite the fact that he should know best how likely it is is a little off.
I'm going to vote:eberron now though.
god, I feel so iffy about the start of both those wagons. Schazer hasn't come back and said anything but NEITHER HAS AKUMU. I know I railed about this for a while but they've pretty much only shown up either when I questioned them or when it was Time to Lynch Eberron.
btw garuru you defended eberron d1 because he was new, what changed. is a few days of play enough in your books?
that said:
a) it's rather a STRETCH to say that there would be an undercover conspiracy to "frame" you. you've acted very scummily and most of the points brought against you are legitimate. the only iffy thing would be people going entirely off of this recent pie stuff to accuse you. you hardly need a CONSPIRACY to lynch someone who tried to get a townie for 2 straight days.
b) IF there was a conspiracy, NOT ALL OF UNDERCOVER WOULD BE PUSHING IT. a fundamental thing of scumplay is that you don't all tie yourselves to one horse. it's pretty unlikely that schaz and whim are both scum. btw referring to schazer with he/him pronouns makes your posts really confusing to read
idk there's legit reasons to lynch schazer I just don't think you've arrived at lynching her through those legit reasons. I'd really appreciate seeing less tunnelvision from you, especially after you supposedly learned your lesson from slorange's flip.
....huh. mm. well alright I guess pala and fogel have cleared some things up...
pala seems better to me too because I think "I have this pie what I don't know things do" makes sotek a pretty solid choice. I'm tentatively trusting of this whole daycoppy biz. :s
also hey garuru I actually voted truegreen a few realtime days ago but it isn't showing up in the votals?
pala I think your logic about truegreen is a bit iffy? I could see scum having at least one vanilla. otoh they probably have some real-ass power roles to counter 3p team and town inventor. I'm worried just thinking about it
but I don't think garuru's infoblast counted enough moving parts to account for all the scum? assuming we can trust him, which the fact that he hasn't commented on your theory despite the fact that he should know best how likely it is is a little off.
I'm going to vote:eberron now though.
god, I feel so iffy about the start of both those wagons. Schazer hasn't come back and said anything but NEITHER HAS AKUMU. I know I railed about this for a while but they've pretty much only shown up either when I questioned them or when it was Time to Lynch Eberron.
btw garuru you defended eberron d1 because he was new, what changed. is a few days of play enough in your books?