RE: Murder By The Book - Day 4: Life of Pie
04-25-2014, 02:18 AM
OK, well I've gone back and reviewed a couple people's posts and I guess it's time to actually make a claim and post some suspicions.
Alright I'm going to start this off with a Vote: Schazer and see if you can follow my train of thought here.
1. So far my suspicion of Schazer has been largely based on how friendly he was with Slorange, me believing Slorange was scum. With Slorange's flip I was quite thrown off.
I have come to realize that it is unlikely that Schazer would have known Slorange's alignment if both were town, his rather dogmatic defenses of Slorange that often lead me to believe they were aligned could in fact point to the very opposite.
It is my opinion that he tried to make the appearance of some sort of link between the two, borrowing some of the accumulated trust Slorange seemed to be building.
It would work perfectly fine for Schazer, even if Slorange got Lynched he could say he'd been backing him the whole time.
2. It has often been commented that Schazer has focused a lot on conversations of mechanics and strategies, often making large walls of text an encouraging conversations of such matters. Particularly memorable to me was Schazer's comment in Post: #323 which attempted to polarize the community based on choice of strategy alone. Something I found highly objectionable.
But I would have brought neither of these things up if it wasn't for
3. The death of the piemaker coupled with the two votes almost instantaneously thrown against me at the beginning of the day, but more importantly the lack of supporting argument alongside these votes. Schazer and Whimbrel both posted with no actual supporting argument, but Schazers strikes me as more suspicious. His remark on my statement felt quite inflammatory, more trying to cause trouble than bring up a legitimate claim against me.
I believe undercover has tried to frame me here and I think Schazer was testing the waters so to speak with their initial attack hoping to garner votes and conflict. Whimbrel may have been in on the plot but I am open to the possibility that he was just a lucky break for scum in this part, unintentionally lending momentum to their initial push.
Alright I'm going to start this off with a Vote: Schazer and see if you can follow my train of thought here.
1. So far my suspicion of Schazer has been largely based on how friendly he was with Slorange, me believing Slorange was scum. With Slorange's flip I was quite thrown off.
I have come to realize that it is unlikely that Schazer would have known Slorange's alignment if both were town, his rather dogmatic defenses of Slorange that often lead me to believe they were aligned could in fact point to the very opposite.
It is my opinion that he tried to make the appearance of some sort of link between the two, borrowing some of the accumulated trust Slorange seemed to be building.
It would work perfectly fine for Schazer, even if Slorange got Lynched he could say he'd been backing him the whole time.
2. It has often been commented that Schazer has focused a lot on conversations of mechanics and strategies, often making large walls of text an encouraging conversations of such matters. Particularly memorable to me was Schazer's comment in Post: #323 which attempted to polarize the community based on choice of strategy alone. Something I found highly objectionable.
But I would have brought neither of these things up if it wasn't for
3. The death of the piemaker coupled with the two votes almost instantaneously thrown against me at the beginning of the day, but more importantly the lack of supporting argument alongside these votes. Schazer and Whimbrel both posted with no actual supporting argument, but Schazers strikes me as more suspicious. His remark on my statement felt quite inflammatory, more trying to cause trouble than bring up a legitimate claim against me.
I believe undercover has tried to frame me here and I think Schazer was testing the waters so to speak with their initial attack hoping to garner votes and conflict. Whimbrel may have been in on the plot but I am open to the possibility that he was just a lucky break for scum in this part, unintentionally lending momentum to their initial push.