RE: Murder By The Book - Day 4: Life of Pie
04-22-2014, 12:01 AM
It was pie damnit! I didn't kill Slorange! I didn't kill anyone! I simply thought Slorange was lying about his power. I mostly thought he was a third party and getting off too easy on dogmatic trust engendered by his standing in the community outside of the game.
Why would I kill him!? It doesn't make any sense. He was my primary suspicion, with him gone the only one I might make a case against is Schazer, and that is on fairly shaky ground seeing how closely he seemed to be working with Slorange. Or maybe I might make a case against Eberron but they seem to be the only one keeping their head in this situation!
For one thing, how would I know he made the pie? And even if I did know why would I choose to eat it then kill him rather than just throw the pie at him? Sure I would have been under scrutiny for not eating the pie, but a lot less than this.
This whole scenario STINKS to me, why doesn't someone make an actual ARGUMENT against me rather than just say, "oh that's mighty suspicious vote: Truegreen"
I get what you're implying but actually have the decency to make some actual accusations rather than just shouting that anything I say sounds 'Scum' I'm looking pointedly at one particular person.
Examine the goop for all I care, I GIVE FULL PERMISSION TO EXAMINE THE GOOP!
It's goddamn Pie Filling, probably Cherry and you will find nothing more than that.
Why would I kill him!? It doesn't make any sense. He was my primary suspicion, with him gone the only one I might make a case against is Schazer, and that is on fairly shaky ground seeing how closely he seemed to be working with Slorange. Or maybe I might make a case against Eberron but they seem to be the only one keeping their head in this situation!
For one thing, how would I know he made the pie? And even if I did know why would I choose to eat it then kill him rather than just throw the pie at him? Sure I would have been under scrutiny for not eating the pie, but a lot less than this.
This whole scenario STINKS to me, why doesn't someone make an actual ARGUMENT against me rather than just say, "oh that's mighty suspicious vote: Truegreen"
I get what you're implying but actually have the decency to make some actual accusations rather than just shouting that anything I say sounds 'Scum' I'm looking pointedly at one particular person.
Examine the goop for all I care, I GIVE FULL PERMISSION TO EXAMINE THE GOOP!
It's goddamn Pie Filling, probably Cherry and you will find nothing more than that.