RE: Murder By The Book - Day 3: The Book of Revelation
04-08-2014, 07:32 PM
Sooo
By your logic any vote against someone who is voting you is going to be a kneejerk reciprocal vote? If someone's voting for anyone for distorted or illogical reasons, that's a good reason to be suspicious of them, regardless of if the person they're voting for is you. At least Nova's attempting to make a case against me that's logically sound rather than (possibly-deliberately) misleading; the same can't be said of anyone else who was on my protowagon (and couldn't be said of him yesterday), so yeah, I am suspicious of people involved in a push against me. It was poor-to-the-point-of-scummy play, as I – and other people! – have pointed out.
But hey, I guess you can selectively ignore whatever you want if that's what you're into. You're beating a pulped horse. Lynch me, or lynch Schazer, or lynch Gnauga; that'll clear up a lot of things you're too busy to figure out. Or instead, you could touch on literally anything else, and it would be a refreshing and possibly-elucidating change of pace. For all that you keep harping on my being too reticent to put forward significant opinions, I at least have expounded on who I'm suspicious of and why, and who I am not suspicious of and why; why is that more salient than the large group of people who have said almost nothing about their thoughts or haven't given the reasoning behind them? Not just the lurkers, but Solaris and Mirdini and Gnauga and Garuru? For all that people keep harping on me for monopolizing the discussion about myself, those same people sure seem to come back to the same points that could be applied to a lot of other people.
By your logic any vote against someone who is voting you is going to be a kneejerk reciprocal vote? If someone's voting for anyone for distorted or illogical reasons, that's a good reason to be suspicious of them, regardless of if the person they're voting for is you. At least Nova's attempting to make a case against me that's logically sound rather than (possibly-deliberately) misleading; the same can't be said of anyone else who was on my protowagon (and couldn't be said of him yesterday), so yeah, I am suspicious of people involved in a push against me. It was poor-to-the-point-of-scummy play, as I – and other people! – have pointed out.
But hey, I guess you can selectively ignore whatever you want if that's what you're into. You're beating a pulped horse. Lynch me, or lynch Schazer, or lynch Gnauga; that'll clear up a lot of things you're too busy to figure out. Or instead, you could touch on literally anything else, and it would be a refreshing and possibly-elucidating change of pace. For all that you keep harping on my being too reticent to put forward significant opinions, I at least have expounded on who I'm suspicious of and why, and who I am not suspicious of and why; why is that more salient than the large group of people who have said almost nothing about their thoughts or haven't given the reasoning behind them? Not just the lurkers, but Solaris and Mirdini and Gnauga and Garuru? For all that people keep harping on me for monopolizing the discussion about myself, those same people sure seem to come back to the same points that could be applied to a lot of other people.