RE: Murder By The Book - Day 2: The Invisible Man
04-01-2014, 09:09 PM
You're right, we should leave you and your Definitely No Powers alive, that will be very helpful to us
I'd vig Truegreen, obviously. Behind you, he's the person I've been most vocal about. That's a pretty reasonable assumption that I shouldn't have to spell out. But I'm not in the business of telling the hypothetical vig we may or may not have who they should target, just pointing out why I would be a bad choice for it. "Who the vig should target" is always "Whoever the vig finds most suspicious", and if that's me, that's their deal. I just don't think it should be, for the reasons I've laid out.
And yes, it's just short of 100% likely that if you're not scum, there are scum on your wagon. Hell, there probably are even if you are, because you're obviously dead in the water at this point. But the difference between knowingly lynching a bodystacker and lynching someone we suspect is scum is huge; in the latter case, scum can build a case against the lynchee based on their votes and posts and history, and when they flip third party the scum can go "Oh well we were right and actively scumhunting but hit a non-scum (but non-town!) target, look how trustworthy we are", whereas in this situation we know before the votes even land that if you do flip third party we shouldn't be any more or less trusting of the people on your wagon. I have no idea what you're even trying to accomplish at this point.
But hey, I'll bite. What motivation could you have for genuinely playing in a pro-town way? How does that aid the likelihood of your wincon? What reason is there to believe that you want me dead for reasons that are good and helpful to town, rather than just sour grapes at the fact that my presence and actions helped lead to you getting lynched so early on? Because I don't see any.
I'd vig Truegreen, obviously. Behind you, he's the person I've been most vocal about. That's a pretty reasonable assumption that I shouldn't have to spell out. But I'm not in the business of telling the hypothetical vig we may or may not have who they should target, just pointing out why I would be a bad choice for it. "Who the vig should target" is always "Whoever the vig finds most suspicious", and if that's me, that's their deal. I just don't think it should be, for the reasons I've laid out.
And yes, it's just short of 100% likely that if you're not scum, there are scum on your wagon. Hell, there probably are even if you are, because you're obviously dead in the water at this point. But the difference between knowingly lynching a bodystacker and lynching someone we suspect is scum is huge; in the latter case, scum can build a case against the lynchee based on their votes and posts and history, and when they flip third party the scum can go "Oh well we were right and actively scumhunting but hit a non-scum (but non-town!) target, look how trustworthy we are", whereas in this situation we know before the votes even land that if you do flip third party we shouldn't be any more or less trusting of the people on your wagon. I have no idea what you're even trying to accomplish at this point.
But hey, I'll bite. What motivation could you have for genuinely playing in a pro-town way? How does that aid the likelihood of your wincon? What reason is there to believe that you want me dead for reasons that are good and helpful to town, rather than just sour grapes at the fact that my presence and actions helped lead to you getting lynched so early on? Because I don't see any.