RE: Murder By The Book - Day 2: The Invisible Man
04-01-2014, 01:07 AM
(03-31-2014, 07:33 AM)Garuru Wrote: »seedy probably needs to chill because at this point she's pretty much tunneling. Also maybe Akumu doesn't want to answer your questions because they're buried in huge textwalls. (not saying Akumu is okay for dodging questions, I'm just playing the devil's advocate here, and saying that if he doesn't want to answer your questions, asking more questions probably isn't going to help? Also, there's been a lot of Akumu focus and little focus on other people.) to me akumu seems kiiind of a little better for your intense focus on him? still vaguely scum but his responses make sense to me, if i were in his shoes i would probably do the same, because gosh textwalls against you are intimidating.
I don't mean to textwall, I'm just a pedant by nature ;-;
(part of it's also that I reread a bunch of posts and then make One Big One instead of making a bunch of little ones throughout the day)
I've been trying to talk about other players and not tunnel too much
it's just, I don't get why "this person does very little, this person casts vague doubt without a vote to back it up, this person crawls out of the woodwork to answer questions but still doesn't have an opinion, etc." isn't getting picked up on by anyone else as suspicious behavior when it's Ultra Classic Scumtells
I want Akumu dead? nothing he has said done has made me feel better?
and you saying this makes me feel even less good about you too...am I scummy for focusing on Akumu? you just say he "seems better but still scum" because of it (wishy-washy) and don't follow that thought through to any opinion on me.
but yeah I'll talk about some other people
... ha ha, just kidding
(03-31-2014, 08:34 AM)Schazer Wrote: »Active players
[...]
Akumu
WHERE are you getting that, for real. can I ask you to do the "find all posts by user thing" and glance over what he's said today because it's NOT BEEN MUCH
I'm good with Solaris (this is partially because they have experience and know how to make sure a post is full of Opinions That Satisfy (but, hey, y'know, OPINIONS) (plus I agree with most of it aside from the fact that I have a nagging and unreasonable suspicion of Schazer)). Agent's decent. granola feels hard to read and sorta frenzied but I don't really agree with his wagon...and some of the votes are Iffy. truegreen feels sooo off but it's really hard for me to wrap my head around scum doing what they did/are doing. Watts is alright, pala and donut are both hovering at a certain level of watchful concern.
[I had some mechanics talk @ truegreen about slorange but I have redacted it as I feel it no longer makes sense in light of recent setup revelations]
oh so granola is 3p. WELP THAT PERFECTLY EXPLAINS ALL MY FEELINGS ABOUT HIM + HIS WAGON. LIKE WOW
I mean I'd disbelieve him but? he felt so 3p and his wagon felt weird and this all makes so much sense
but not leaving him around ALSO makes sense
Pala can you explain how (to reiterate myself) "this person does very little, this person casts vague doubt without a vote to back it up, this person crawls out of the woodwork to answer questions but still doesn't have an opinion, etc." can be wholly summed up as a 'playstyle difference?' surely your critique of dalm counts as that too, then. and even eberron, maybe! 'playstyle difference' is starting to feel like a buzzword.
(for the record I don't like what dalm is doing either)
(03-31-2014, 08:26 PM)Palamedes Wrote: »Wait donut, there was a debate between you and granola? (besides the one about which is a better secondary breakfast option at least.)
10/10 I laughed
(also duly noted, both you and donut seem to be having Life Issues so I'll bring down the watchful concern a notch)