RE: Murder By The Book - Day 2: The Invisible Man
03-29-2014, 10:43 PM
Hmm...
I have to say that I don't really feel too comfortable with Schazer right now. So far she's been very mechanics-focused and extremely helpful towards Truegreen in particular. It's not like Truegreen is the only new one here, so why all the advice? I'm tempted to say they're aligned, but if they were mafia, they would probably just take it to daychat. It also really feels like other people are jumping in to help Truegreen as well. So... Not sure what to think here at all, and I don't want to assume too much.
Still really annoyed by people pushing very hard for an eberron lynch, but I will admit he does look kind of scummy right now, from kind of flip-flopping between convictions. My vibe is telling me that he's town, trying his best to cover for his early mistakes. I feel like everyone pushing for eberron is trying too hard to have a lynch today, though whether it's a mislynch or an information lynch probably depends on the person voting. Honestly, eberron is the ULTRA PRIME #1 info lynch, because of the ridiculous number of people attacking or supporting him, so even then, there's not much to go on, at least until Eberron flips, if he does get lynched/killed.
Yeah, sorry for the confusion re: my too-short post. I meant that it's complex and yet believable, meaning that if Slorange was scum and making that up, it would take a hell of a lot of (unnecessary) skill to fabricate such a complicated situation, instead of simply lying based on Occam's Razor (where the simplest explanation is usually the correct one). Thus, Slorange had no real reason to make up such a complicated situation, were he scum.
Granola's response, above, was kind of odd as well. Basically it seemed much too vehement a reply against a casual suggestion that you guys may be together. And yeah, the fact that Sotek jumped from you to Eberron, then you started voting Eberron, seems more than just a coincidence.
And I honestly wouldn't count out the option that Sotek was hyperbussing you D1 when it was the least likely to actually go through, so it would seem like the two of you aren't aligned. His "case" on you was kind of really weak after all, having happened during RVS based on one post, then like 3 or 4 posts after that continuing to point him out then complaining about not enough people voting him. I'm still trying to understand WHY he voted Granola in the first place, but it's laden with RPing. (see this is why you don't RP in mafia games) It appears to be based on the ethics of no-lynching? Either way, Granola's post didn't look too scummy, or at least not scummy enough to warrant a day-long tunneling, ignoring the current circumstances up until today.
I am going to vote: Sotek for being the most likely scum out of the pair.
I have to say that I don't really feel too comfortable with Schazer right now. So far she's been very mechanics-focused and extremely helpful towards Truegreen in particular. It's not like Truegreen is the only new one here, so why all the advice? I'm tempted to say they're aligned, but if they were mafia, they would probably just take it to daychat. It also really feels like other people are jumping in to help Truegreen as well. So... Not sure what to think here at all, and I don't want to assume too much.
Still really annoyed by people pushing very hard for an eberron lynch, but I will admit he does look kind of scummy right now, from kind of flip-flopping between convictions. My vibe is telling me that he's town, trying his best to cover for his early mistakes. I feel like everyone pushing for eberron is trying too hard to have a lynch today, though whether it's a mislynch or an information lynch probably depends on the person voting. Honestly, eberron is the ULTRA PRIME #1 info lynch, because of the ridiculous number of people attacking or supporting him, so even then, there's not much to go on, at least until Eberron flips, if he does get lynched/killed.
(03-28-2014, 04:44 PM)Truegreen Wrote: »Complexity does not usually imply Veracity. It is in fact the complexity of Slorange's claim that I have issue with.
Yeah, sorry for the confusion re: my too-short post. I meant that it's complex and yet believable, meaning that if Slorange was scum and making that up, it would take a hell of a lot of (unnecessary) skill to fabricate such a complicated situation, instead of simply lying based on Occam's Razor (where the simplest explanation is usually the correct one). Thus, Slorange had no real reason to make up such a complicated situation, were he scum.
Granola's response, above, was kind of odd as well. Basically it seemed much too vehement a reply against a casual suggestion that you guys may be together. And yeah, the fact that Sotek jumped from you to Eberron, then you started voting Eberron, seems more than just a coincidence.
And I honestly wouldn't count out the option that Sotek was hyperbussing you D1 when it was the least likely to actually go through, so it would seem like the two of you aren't aligned. His "case" on you was kind of really weak after all, having happened during RVS based on one post, then like 3 or 4 posts after that continuing to point him out then complaining about not enough people voting him. I'm still trying to understand WHY he voted Granola in the first place, but it's laden with RPing. (see this is why you don't RP in mafia games) It appears to be based on the ethics of no-lynching? Either way, Granola's post didn't look too scummy, or at least not scummy enough to warrant a day-long tunneling, ignoring the current circumstances up until today.
I am going to vote: Sotek for being the most likely scum out of the pair.
![[Image: 6xGo4ab.png]](https://i.imgur.com/6xGo4ab.png)
![[Image: sig.gif]](https://backloggery.com/garuru/sig.gif)