SCP-MAFIA -NIGHT 4 - ...again!? 10/21

I mean I don't want to break out the quotes and LEGIT REASONING FOR LYNCHES in this game but if people are just going to sit there and not do anything and then bandwagon on some random person to end the day I'm not liable for my actions

just from yesterday Fogel

I think that covers everyone who's actually talked since this day got relatively active? Well, other than Walrus, but he's almost definitely hard-to-kill scum. At best he might be a hard-to-kill third-party.

Vote: SupahKiven

That's just blatant bandwagoning - it's entirely he hopes that the slow pace of the game will let it go through. I'd like at least one marginally substantial post from him.

votes to lynch a guy for bandwagoning (on the bandwagon he later joins)

Twenty minutes to go, and nobody's said a thing in a while.

Unvote
Vote: Piester because this is all I can do right now to give us any chance of a lynch.

I'm still not thrilled with how little Pala is actually saying about why he's voting people, but this lynch will tell us something, at the very least. If Piester turns up town, I'm not letting up on Pala. Heck, if Piester turns up third-party I'll still be wary, though less so. On the other hand, if Piester's scum, Pala's probably town.

I'll keep watching for a last-minute surge of activity that may allow me to change my vote.

and then goes 'if this guy flips town, THIS GUY IS SUSPICIOUS' with no reasoning other than 'Palamedes voted this guy with little to no reasoning'

which I'm really suspicious of because it seems a heck of a lot like scum playing lynch dominos

not to mention the bonus tacked-on sentence of 'I'm only voting because otherwise we'd have no lynch and I'd totally change my vote if I could'

and his wonderfully scummy position on the end of the Red lynch

Red709: 7 (Schazer, soundlyParanoid, AgentBlue, Palamedes, Sruixan, Dragon Fogel, FelixSparks)