Tropefia - A PYP - N5: Downed Guy (11/24) (need replacement)

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tropefia - A PYP - N5: Downed Guy (11/24) (need replacement)
RE: Tropefia - A PYP - D3: Dead Walrus (19/24) - You can talk again
Alright, looking over yd12k's posts once more just to be extra-sure I'm okay with switching to him

Quote:Also re me being a survivor: Then I'd lurk better? Or do anything besides arguing, since it's not giving me townpoints.
This feels like the same argument we were criticizing myw for, just shorter? The whole "not giving me townpoints" thing does not reflect well

In a more general sense: yd12k has contributed very little, but he started putting semi-useful input in today, so while I don't really see him as town...

myw's post breakdown is as follows:
Day 1: Single RVS, no other contribution that I can find via the post searcher.
Day 2: Softclaim and "calibornio is scum"; vote for calibornio (as soon as Pala presses him on it) with little else of substance noted; "I dunno, I got nuthin to say but wait, the one who talks the most is the biggest target That doesn't really wanna make me talk more" which imo is the first hint of unnecessary defensiveness; "I don't see why scummy people would talk at this point," unsure if 2create is scum so he should roleclaim naturally; defensiveness; this post:
Quote:Well I think he's scum now, because he's deciding to vote for me at the turn of the hat when I'm asking for information to make him seem less scummy.

Last time I checked, 2Create had the most votes for him.

Roleclaims are not the only information obtainable, but I'd say they carry more weight than "I think this guy is X because he smells funny"

He doesn't have the majority of the votes, but 10 in hammer, right? If it were me I really wouldn't wait till my votes got any higher before trying to hand out any kind of useful information to prove my notscumminess.
...which in my opinion looks more informative than it really is, and is arguably more defensiveness; one-line meta question; oh hey an actually meaningful post wow that's nice; more pushing for roleclaim hahaha never mind; MORE pushing for roleclaim jesus fucking christ wow; meaningful post but I'm pretty sure most of it had already been said; "I figure saying scummy scum is about the same. I did already suspect him, this just makes it more apparent. It is a reaction, but I have some logic behind it." the fuck does that even mean, also more "I sure am dubious of calibornio"; actual reasoning, but with some defensiveness sprinkled in; "hope 2create is actually scum" I mean okay sure.

And then we had today's defensiveness fest. So, short version: Day one almost no contributions; day two, some rolefishing (or what seemed like it) and refusal to back down on that front, peppered with some defensiveness and the occasional dash of actual insight; and today, lots of "no you shouldn't lynch me here's why."

I would vote for yd12k, but looking back... I feel like myw really should have set me off from the start. I'm leaving my vote where it is.


Messages In This Thread
RE: Tropefia - A PYP - D3: Dead Walrus (19/24) - You can talk again - by MaxieSatan - 06-09-2013, 03:53 PM