Re: WHO ARE THE REAL MONSTERS?!?!?!??!? MAFIA D1: Some guy died
01-24-2013, 08:18 PM
Originally posted on MSPA by Palamedes.
Oh right Mr. Guy. I already (think) I talked about him but I'll try to summarize it quickly while I'm still concious. Most obvious is his relationship with people I think are suspicious (you and Tea mostly) and also I think he handled the opening game in a way scum don't usually (stayed active through it even when people went after him. He's also been posting frequently enough and always with some sort of take on what's been going on, as opposed to just making unrelated or unimportant one sentence remarks. Then of course there's the whole general vibes feeling from his posts.
The second case up there works in the same way the first does, by talking about how you didn't want to go over it until it was 'relevant' you implied that there would be a time when it was relevant to go over what you had gained, and therefore that something was gained out of it in the first place. The third is also the same but substitute 'relevant' for 'at this point'.
Sorry if I'm not being totally clear but my head's all messed up right now. I'm gonna go rest and see if I can get more sensible, let me know if there's still some confusion and I'll try to clear it up again then.
Oh right Mr. Guy. I already (think) I talked about him but I'll try to summarize it quickly while I'm still concious. Most obvious is his relationship with people I think are suspicious (you and Tea mostly) and also I think he handled the opening game in a way scum don't usually (stayed active through it even when people went after him. He's also been posting frequently enough and always with some sort of take on what's been going on, as opposed to just making unrelated or unimportant one sentence remarks. Then of course there's the whole general vibes feeling from his posts.
The second case up there works in the same way the first does, by talking about how you didn't want to go over it until it was 'relevant' you implied that there would be a time when it was relevant to go over what you had gained, and therefore that something was gained out of it in the first place. The third is also the same but substitute 'relevant' for 'at this point'.
Sorry if I'm not being totally clear but my head's all messed up right now. I'm gonna go rest and see if I can get more sensible, let me know if there's still some confusion and I'll try to clear it up again then.