Re: WHO ARE THE REAL MONSTERS?!?!?!??!? MAFIA D1: Some guy died
01-24-2013, 06:16 PM
Originally posted on MSPA by Mister Visceral.
So I seriously went back through my posts to see where I might have "gone on" about having reads from the catvote. These are the things I've said about catvote.
And then I made not a single post until I actually analyze the reactions that occurred.
I am honestly baffled at how, if you're town, you're getting all of these notions about me. I never claimed to have solid reads on the catvote reactions, and you are saying that I am and using that as the basis for the argument against me.
Actually that's pretty unfair. I pretty much did give the reads as a reaction to getting crucified for not having them. So that point stands. But the first part of your argument is still completely invalid. And still confuses me. Because I kind of have a townread on you but don't know where the hell you're getting the basis of your argument from.
Oh right me going after your "strongest townread".
1) How is he your strongest townread?
2) How is what I pointed out not a valid thing to be suspicious of?
3) How does the fact that I'm going after a guy you think is towny make me scum?
...The more I look at it, the more your fabricated argument looks like pushing an easy mislynch on me.
HEART OF THE CARDS.
Vote Palamedes
(I don't remember the last time I went with my gut on anything when my mind told me otherwise aaaaaaaaaaaaaa)
So I seriously went back through my posts to see where I might have "gone on" about having reads from the catvote. These are the things I've said about catvote.
Mister Visceral Wrote:Hey look he knows. And if you're wondering why I stated it with such assuredness, it's because nothing ever really gets reacted to unless you say it with 100% assuredness. Like my bullshit catvote, the reactions to which will be forever stowed away until they become relevant.
Mister Visceral Wrote:I even said that I didn't get anything from it the moment it was brought to my attention.Palamedes Wrote:Visceral I will vote for you if you don't give me what you 'got' out of that Catvote within the next five hours or so, and I will then never unvote you until you are dead.Nothing at the moment. No flips yet, sir, and I don't feel like going back and analyzing it until it becomes vaguely relevant.
Mister Visceral Wrote:I still don't claim to have any reads. If you are going to twist this, "people (town and scum alike) are going to jump on my ridiculous reads saying..." into me saying I have reads, understand the entire hypothetical context of that sentence.Palamedes Wrote:Too bad. Do it. Only a couple people reacted so give me your analysis if those people died and flipped scum/town.No. :>
It's just not worth it at this point. In fact, it would probably end up being anti-town just because of how awful my analyses end up being - people (town and scum alike) are going to jump on my ridiculous reads saying "I don't see that connection" or "hm... this one certainly is a thing" and it's generally going to end up being unproductive for town, especially because I would probably end up getting lynched over them.
Mister Visceral Wrote:I've been wrong far too much lately to try to scrap together some bullshit reads on people with vague reactions to my catvote, when people are just going to take that post and run with it. I'll be happy to do other, more useful, more plausible and reasonable things once the opportunity for me to do so arises.I would have to "scrap together some bullshit reads on people" meaning "I don't have any reads at the moment and would have to make them up."
I'll conjecture about them once flips happen. Until then, if I put anything out there, even as a "wild guess", I'll just get persecuted for it. Not worth it at this point. I'm not going to post opinions now when they aren't based on anything.
And then I made not a single post until I actually analyze the reactions that occurred.
I am honestly baffled at how, if you're town, you're getting all of these notions about me. I never claimed to have solid reads on the catvote reactions, and you are saying that I am and using that as the basis for the argument against me.
Palamedes Wrote:So Visceral.The only flak I received between 233 (me refusing to make up reads) and me giving my two shits was this:
Why exactly did you go on about how you had links and theories but didn't want to reveal them, and then as soon as you started taking flak from people besides me you come in and say 'lol secretly I had nothing'. You going after Mr. Guy for agreeing with me doesn't help you either because Guy is town as hell (my strongest townread by far anyways).
anacreon Wrote:Ok MV is looking horribad now like really horribad from that Exchange between him and pala. MV people are already jumping at you right now for not sharing your opinions.No offense to anacreon, but that wasn't exactly what stirred me to action.
Actually that's pretty unfair. I pretty much did give the reads as a reaction to getting crucified for not having them. So that point stands. But the first part of your argument is still completely invalid. And still confuses me. Because I kind of have a townread on you but don't know where the hell you're getting the basis of your argument from.
Oh right me going after your "strongest townread".
1) How is he your strongest townread?
2) How is what I pointed out not a valid thing to be suspicious of?
3) How does the fact that I'm going after a guy you think is towny make me scum?
...The more I look at it, the more your fabricated argument looks like pushing an easy mislynch on me.
HEART OF THE CARDS.
Vote Palamedes
(I don't remember the last time I went with my gut on anything when my mind told me otherwise aaaaaaaaaaaaaa)