Re: WHO ARE THE REAL MONSTERS?!?!?!??!? MAFIA D1: Some guy died
01-23-2013, 08:17 PM
Originally posted on MSPA by Luneix.
Wait - *puts on deerstalker hat and faux British accent* - Watson, I do believe I have a deduction to present!
If we view the facts that Mister Visceral has placed before us in a mathematical sense, I am almost certain that it places a new skew on the events that have taken place here -
For think on this - young master Visceral has stated that his enjoyment of this metaphorical game is derived from three things: being the inherent fun of the game - labelled quite eloquently as "totes fun" - the joy he derives from engaging in banter, rhetoric and soliloquy, and thirdly - and perhaps the most key clue to this entire debacle - the excitement that Sir Visceral generates when he is able to fool other players; pretending his innocence under false pretenses, as it were.
Why is this of any import or significance? Elementary my dear Watson! Displayed more plainly, this information could be stated in the form of:
Town!Visceral!Enjoyment= [Mafia!Fun]+[Rhetoric!Fun] = 2 Fun Units
Scum!Visceral!Enjoyment= [Mafia!Fun]+[Rhetoric!Fun]+[Acting!Fun] = 3 Fun Units
Therefore, one can see quite clearly, that were this good chap instead to be a dreadful and most despicable rapscallion, he would be deriving a much greater joy than usual from this game of murders of mafiosi in which we now find ourselves embroiled!
As I am - how do they say... - uninitiated in the ways of the man in question, I am uncertain as to what this evidence indicates. However, I would wager that perhaps, one of you could be of assistance in this matter?
Can you help Holmes solve the case?
Wait - *puts on deerstalker hat and faux British accent* - Watson, I do believe I have a deduction to present!
If we view the facts that Mister Visceral has placed before us in a mathematical sense, I am almost certain that it places a new skew on the events that have taken place here -
For think on this - young master Visceral has stated that his enjoyment of this metaphorical game is derived from three things: being the inherent fun of the game - labelled quite eloquently as "totes fun" - the joy he derives from engaging in banter, rhetoric and soliloquy, and thirdly - and perhaps the most key clue to this entire debacle - the excitement that Sir Visceral generates when he is able to fool other players; pretending his innocence under false pretenses, as it were.
Why is this of any import or significance? Elementary my dear Watson! Displayed more plainly, this information could be stated in the form of:
Town!Visceral!Enjoyment= [Mafia!Fun]+[Rhetoric!Fun] = 2 Fun Units
Scum!Visceral!Enjoyment= [Mafia!Fun]+[Rhetoric!Fun]+[Acting!Fun] = 3 Fun Units
Therefore, one can see quite clearly, that were this good chap instead to be a dreadful and most despicable rapscallion, he would be deriving a much greater joy than usual from this game of murders of mafiosi in which we now find ourselves embroiled!
As I am - how do they say... - uninitiated in the ways of the man in question, I am uncertain as to what this evidence indicates. However, I would wager that perhaps, one of you could be of assistance in this matter?
Can you help Holmes solve the case?