RE: -=- Crooks Hollow III Mafia -=- Day Two: Back to the Tables (21/21)
05-04-2013, 04:09 PM
(05-04-2013, 08:43 AM)beruru Wrote: »(05-04-2013, 08:38 AM)btp Wrote: »If I truly wanted to rid a player from the game, I could begin to promote day-murders, but I don't think that is necessary.
you dont want to lynch anyone?
you dont think anyone is suspicious even a tiny bit???
i um
i'm upset a little
"day-murders" is in reference to encouraging myself or other players to instantly kill someone else. No, there isn't anyone who I definitively feel deserves to be killed. There are no players that I am fully convinced are town, nor are there players who I am fully convinced are scum. As such I am voting towards a player who I believe the town/game would be better off without, regardless of alignment. But I realize, for many, that would not be the preferred reason for an execution (via lynch or otherwise). I suspect that other players may dislike this particular decision, and they are free to react to it how they choose.
However, should someone appear who I do see as definitively town/scum. I would be sure to defend/change my vote as appropriate.
Can someone explain to me why mass-claims are exclusively anti-town? While it does risk revealing town power roles, solid claims would then risk putting scum-parties in jeopardy. I would think it would be frustrating to both.
Hence: Just because someone dislikes players claiming, doesn't mean they are town.