RE: -=- Crooks Hollow III Mafia -=- Day One: Wine Cellar (21/21)
04-21-2013, 06:39 AM
(04-21-2013, 04:35 AM)Yewchung Wrote: »Alright, so my opinions on the lynch brigades thus far.
Mathgirl: I think she's town actually, as she was trying to get us out of RVS and into conversation mode, and did so again during the suivig disscussion when it was apparent that the conversation wasn't going to cause actual game to happen. Thus, by extension that makes Kane and possibly Cat suspicious. Also I'm going to call more suspicion on Cat for bandwagoning based on a very weak argument by Kane.
[...]
Also, while lynching inactive players is a thing you can do, it's generally a safe lynch, and thus is one that I would think that scum team would push for.
I'm just going to go ahead and Vote: Mathgirl for now. See my above statement for reasoning.
Can I vote you harder please?
I'm not doing the lurkerlynch thing because it's safe, I'm doing it because I see no other viable path to hit scum. The players who were active earlier on were reasonably towny with their logic and finger pointing. I don't like any wagon that's going on, and I'm much more comfortable with a lurkerlynch than a no lynch. And when I noticed that you had posted and read the thread, I kept my vote where it was because I wanted to get some reads goddammit. Which I'm getting out of you, and I'm not liking.
You're being waffly and I don't like it.
More things from this post that I don't like:
(04-21-2013, 04:35 AM)Yewchung Wrote: »Tea and Sea strike me as coaligned, so I'd watch for that.why?
(04-21-2013, 04:35 AM)Yewchung Wrote: »Granola seems to also have been trying to prevent RVS from ending, which isn't a good thing for town at all. Basic logic states that lynching D1, though random, is always better than a nolynch. Preventing an end to RVS so the deadline will hit is a scummy thing to do.
When? I feel like Granola did his part in helping to end rvs. What post are you even referring to when you say that? This post is the only one I saw that was taking place at the relevant time, and it doesn't have those characteristics you portray him as having... He was posting legitimate thoughts by that point, not trying to lengthen rvs.
Oddly enough, I don't find myself disagreeing fundamentally with the stuff Yew said about Tea, but on the whole, I don't like that post.
Yewchung, a few questions:
a) Why are you voting me rather than literally anyone else that you didn't say was a townread?
b) What relates Tea and Sea so strongly?
c) What posts of Granolaman gave you that read?