-=- Crooks Hollow III Mafia -=- Day Five? (3/21)

Third: Dini's kind of freaking me out this game? Let's see...

Game was pretty dead, got posty to make things happen. Lemme see if I can't address some of your stuff though.

Then it's "Yeah Math's been weird, but not weird enough for me to want to lynch usually BUT I guess we're not usual anymore", and you would usually expect the next words to be "vote: Math" except they're not.

thing is that's nowhere near weird enough for me to condone a lynch normally? Guess we're not in normal country anymore so HEY GUYS PREPARE TO BE JUDGED FOR YOUR ONE-SIX TOTAL RVS POSTS

Note the big sarcastic all-caps response to the idea of lynching someone for just feeling sort of off. I've never been okay with math lynch!

Next, "Killing lurkers is bad but lynching active people because they're a little weird is worse." Sure, but then he votes to lynch Yew, because he's lurking, and then didn't mention Tea, who hadn't posted in the game at all.

I'd expect Tea to forget he's in a game. Knowing Yewchung from MSPA I am rather surprised he missed a game starting.

He then gives them both a pass in his next post, 126, which I also don't like, because Dini's building a lot of cases against people(read: Math) and then putting his vote on someone else. This also happens in 117, to a lesser extent.

What case have I built against Math I've pointed out why she's been weird, yes? But that's me elucidating what other people are going "oh you're weird" over, not going "these are the reason why math is scum". Because I am not really of that opinion at all!

(I'm also not entirely sure why you're voting garuru. You say it's a logical fallacy but I'm really confused how, because I think it's just fine?)

He says quite literally that he does not agree with basing this lynch (or rather a no lynch) off of ethical play considerations. Then he says he doesn't want to lynch a lurker because it feels wrong, which is an ethical consideration. Connect the dots~


and yeah while TehPilot has posted 6 times and pretty much all of his posts haven't had content in them he uh also hasn't posted since before the end of RVS/suivig discussion which means why the heck /would/ his posts have any content in them. You could criticize anyone who hasn't posted since that time like this.

Would like to note pretty much all your criticisms of TehPilot work equally well on Mathgirl? Your scum read on Pilot rests on your point that his 5th post is 'doing something that looks like getting out of RVS while doing nothing' which applies equally to Mathie's CDV and his 6th being 'I guess that wraps up suivig discussion' where mathie did the exact same thing two posts earlier.

and I don't even consider that very scummy considering the fact that they were right and we /were/ pretty much done with suivig discussion? Sure it's a bit off but it's certainly not enough to give me a scumread on either of them.

my beef with garuru OTOH is still a thing.

kane going 'my vote wasn't random' iiiis a thing too I will give that to seastorm. ~You seem to have much more on me though sea so why aren't you voting me instead~

Tea/Pala fighting over inanities nothing new to see here