Re: Mafia: The Last Resort [D3: Colourblind]
10-14-2011, 03:32 PM
TimeothyHour Wrote:Woffles Wrote:That would give us essentially three confirmed townies, along with me as, if you won't take my word, at the very least confirmed nonmafia.
The way you kind of dropped that suggestion of you being innocent, along with the argument that's been started with wheats, makes me really really suspicious of you, woffles. I didn't feel like Solaris is particularly scummy, more like he's suffering of not-being-caught-up-with-mafias syndrome, but your violent reaction to the accusation makes me suspicious of both you AND him. At the very least, this is suspicious enough that at the very least I think you have a harmful third-party role.
Vote: Woffles
First of all, I didn't even state my own innocence. In that post I actually immediately address the concern that I could be a violent third party, and say that even so I probably won't simply get added to the mafia.
Second, if you didn't think Solaris is scum, why is me defending him from a bullshit claim like "he's not really reaally scumhunting" making you rethink that opinion? If you think he's town, and someone else defends that person whom you don't know the alignment of, why does that change your view on both of them?
Third, name me one harmful third party role that immediately gets aligned with an existing player after relocation. I can think of serial killer, cult leader, survivor, crazySchazy lovermaker, but none of these get added to Solaris in any way. I have no reason to protect him at all as a third party. Also on that note, why are you only considering me as 3p? If I suddenly pop in much more vocal after getting my role switched up, defending Solaris with the anger of twenty suns as if everyone is implying me to do, wouldn't it make infinitely more sense for me to have flipped to mafia alongside Solaris? Why are you calling me "harmful third party" instead of downright maf? Are you believing what I said in my first post? Then why is it making me scummy to say that?
By the way, weren't you connected to g0m? And both on Pharmacy's side? I could've sworn
whoosh! Wrote:There may be a reward of some form for the team that winsWhy yeah! There was!
Wheat, from all your examples in pink I can only see that Solaris has been protecting players. If you'd look over at the dramatis personae, you'd see that we have killed not a single mafia. Not one. You haven't called out anyone of the poeple on every town wagon at all, but now you're calling out Solaris for distancing himself from those lynches. You just can't tell the difference between distancing from a town lynch and genuinely just not wanting the lynch because those people are town in their eyes. This happens often in games with many players where one meek reasoning against a player causes an easy bandwagon for mafs to ride that wave to townlynch. Look at the people voting a townlynch instead of the people not voting the townlynch.
And on your claim of Solaris not scumhunting, well... have some of his suspicions.
Quote:I do not particularly like MrGuy.
PL I feel the worst about.
If Pyps is mafia, then Sruixian is likely town.
If he's town, then I would think that Times is deserving of suspicions.
You're suspecting Solaris, MrGuy ON SOL'S LIST follows with a
Quote:Speakin' of followin' Vic's lead, y'know... I don't really like Solaris either.You try to brush off bullshitvoting me for a second there as a voting trap, PL ALSO ON SOL'S LIST swoops in to affirm the trap.
ProfessorLizzard Wrote:Nice voting trap with Woff, Wheat.PYP flips town, Times ALSO ALSO ON SOL'S LIST votes me alongside you with some halfhearted suspicions that make no sense for a townie to think in any case to begin with. And to top the last one off Mirdi got a result that Times and g0m are linked, which he outright denies. Also not looking too good on his case.
quidquid Latine dictum sit altum videtur.