Destroy the Godmodder: MSPAradox (Test Session)

Destroy the Godmodder: MSPAradox (Test Session)
#96
RE: Destroy the Godmodder: MSPAradox (Test Session)
I point out the Godmodder's attack against Ten11 isn't something a Godmodder could do, since the Simumodder, while being a Godmodder, still has to follow a small level of indirect damaging rules, and the Simumodder wasn't even describing doing damage at all through a means. Therefore, the Simumodder dealt 6 damage for no reason. Therefore by that logic, I should be able to do something like that. I go back in time, give Ten11 a "Deflection Shield" which deflects one attack back at the source of the attack. Therefore the Simumodder takes 6 damage, since, of course, without a means, the damage is always the same no matter the target, because Godmodder resistance isn't accounted for because resistance to damage implies an object or thing that is durable. But that is useless vs a definitive statement of damage. When you say "I hit him with a sword, I deal 6 damage." Then there is a means and because of armor damage can be reduced. However, here, we have "Deal 6 damage." Armor is useless because it is not an attack, it is a statement of damage. Therefore, by deflecting the statement of "Deal 6 damage" back at the Simumodder, the Simumodder stands no chance versus it.
Quote


Messages In This Thread
RE: Destroy the Godmodder: MSPAradox (Test Session) - by Redrover1760 - 01-02-2019, 04:52 PM