The Wander Island Incident - Night Four - Five For One [13/21]

Truth be told I had completely overlooked Sai indirectly claiming busdriver towards the end of D3. I don't agree with Niall's analysis in #852 knowing that since claiming a role that targets two people (at least in my usual perspective) is either busdriver or scientist which are super disruptive to scum. Basically what CB said in #859. I wouldn't think keeping Granola alive for wine purposes would be a stronger motive than killing a very disruptive role out in the open.

I've received at least one vote every day and everyone's read on me thus far has been middling at best with many people saying I've acted suspicious. I'm an easy, lazy lynch for someone who wants to get this day over with before we have time to examine the facts.

which, honestly Reads To Me like "I'm far too suspicious To Be Suspicious" which. Maybe if I were a Metagame Guru like some of y'all, this would make some degree of sense but I ain't and it Don't

Inclined to agree with this. Niall's response reads defensively to me. Really want to see what elaboration is offered regarding nightactions (if any).

Elect: Coldblooded

--

@Niall: you say you're an easy lynch for the day. What about the vote for Beru (the lynch you're favoring at the time of writing)?

@Granola: why Schazer?

@Slorange: you said Sai/NTA's flips would help with your read on x's alignment (#788); any thoughts on that now?

@RL: does Sai and NTA both flipping town have any significant impact on your view of the gamestate?