The Wander Island Incident - Night Four - Five For One [13/21]

The Wander Island Incident - Night Four - Five For One [13/21]
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Denouement [16/21]
@TehPilot: not did not agree but did not understand. Slorange's not-posting-as-much coupled with my not-rereading-enough made his overall Thing not stick in my mind as much as it could, so people-who-are-not-me having alignment-read confidence was... unsettling? something like that. To his credit he appears to be one of the few people to have payed attention to li'l ole me, but at the same time that singular thing what I remember about his behavior feels like it might be some kinda long-con. My own behavior hasn't helped, but I've been over that.

@Schazer: supposing you and Slorange are both telling the truth about you and you and you and you and you, is it possible you were the SK target? something something souls eating, something more than one soul to eat something. Or, when all we have to go on is flavor, might as well make the most of what we can taste, right? Slorange, you're welcome to chime in if you can corroborate.

@Granolaman: Don't forget hidden powers as a theme. So far most of it's been bulletproofing, but Reyweld exists as precedent that it could be wackier. Theoretically, this makes Jac mechanically more likely to be town, though the specific scenario I envision raises its own complications and is likely just me conspiracy-theory-ing again.


Actual Reread Time, back shortly. hopefully.
Quote


Messages In This Thread
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Denouement [16/21] - by Not The Author - 09-13-2018, 04:41 AM