The Wander Island Incident - Night Four - Five For One [13/21]

Really tehpilot, you need me to spell it out for you?

Forgive me not picking up on the context immediately. I appreciate your thorough response and explanation, just not the sort of tone this line gives off. I would rather not get heated about the game.

It doesn't look great and was a semi-thoughtless action, you are right, you're welcome to hold that against me. #619 is my rationale, I don't have anything else to offer on that front.

I have my concerns about your insistence on this, though:

I wasn't getting into your completely out of nowhere hint about your role, but since you brought it up, under what circumstances would you think that was a pro-town decision? Mirdini made it very clear that a massclaim would be a bad idea for town, and unless I'm remembering incorrectly, you were under no pressure at the time in any way that should have caused you to drop something like that to try to protect yourself.

In what regards was my purported hint near massclaim level of information divulgence? I would think anything I've said so far about my role or knowledge of game information is far less impactful on the subject of damaging claims than what has been said by Jacquerel / Coldblooded / Airey with their info drops today.

But if you could throw out your top 3 scumreads and top 3 town reads with a bit of explanation, I'd appreciate it.

I'm going to exclude Jacquerel, Coldblooded (top two townreads), and Airey (top scumread) in this since I think their current standing and reasoning is plain as day, and you probably want a deeper reply than that. I have a good read on Seedy at the moment. Good posts, good pressure on other avenues while the aC lynch was progressing. Beyond that, I was a fan of the BlazerC and Acio slots before their replacement. That's up for review with you and Lordly now in the driver's seat, but I am content with believing those slots do not necessarily belong to scum.

Scumside: don't like Numbers or NTA. Both are low postcount with little committal action. I do not pick up on any strong interactions with other players from them; it feels dodgy.

I did express in the past I was not a fan of Solaris; I feel this less with their posting behaviors in late D2 and today and following aC's flip. Airey's actions also do not support a world that contains scum Solaris either. Beyond those three, Schazer is the most aggravating of my uncertain reads.

Other misc. thoughts: the push on RL early this day was backed by my strong townreads; RL's response to pressure feels genuine enough emotionally it doesn't contribute to a scumread on them. Granola looks weird on votes in a vacuum, but I don't get scum vibes from their posts. Withholding opinions on Pala and Slorange until I finish rereading the thread.

--

Also can I reiterate that Airey's tunneling on the SK is weird as hell? Like damn. Post #638 makes me think it could be coming from an uninformed stance, but it's beyond uninformed weird.

Also I don't buy the explanation offered where Airey, Jac, and Solaris all apparently were supposed to die but didn't. CB and Airey are offering different explanations for a survival mechanism and both can't be right. It's too convoluted for me to believe at a glance. Occam's Razor, etc etc.