The Wander Island Incident - Night Four - Five For One [13/21]

Hi Pilot

Hi.

what do you think of Airey

One thing I want to point out in #544 is Airey's justification for voting Solaris - it's based on people who are claiming death-activated roles and thinking Solaris is third party. I don't agree that Solaris's actions are indicative of 3P and I would not take a sarcastic (?) Solaris post at face value as proof of anything.

Other than that it's theorycrafting about AC, a comment on Beru's recent replacement, and commentary on the number of on-death roleclaims. I'm not fond of calling Solaris their top priority based on that without saying much of anything about why the other options are less preferred.

And something that just now stands out to me: Airey mentions BlazerC looks like scum but wants to prioritize their 3P read on Solaris - why?

Vote: Airey

and are Solaris and AC still your top scumreads?

aC yes. Their detached play still has me suspecting it's a way to put pressure on ice. Solaris a little less so. The people who followed my vote onto them do not look good and I can't continue to hold out on thinking Solaris/aC are coaligned since at this point scum!Solaris would be dedicated to throwing their teammate under the bus.

(Solaris' overall tone (their posting voice, persay) does not strike me as totally scummy, but it's definitely not a town tone to me. Based purely on reactions to things, I would say some replies are solidly not town.)

--

Note: I have no desire to superanalyze what transpired between Acio/Seedy. The bulk of that exchange, as a semantics/meta argument, has no interest to me. I agree with Acio's stance on role logistics, and I did not think that most of the purported death-role "claims" were legitimate to begin with (BlazerC I do think is legitimate, aC never explicitly made the claim and instead goes for the anticlaim, Solaris was def. joking, Schazer has been joking about it since D1 and they're playing an evasive game regardless).