The Wander Island Incident - Night Four - Five For One [13/21]

Hi hey both of you. Do you disagree with the behavioral case here. Granola, whether or not you can successfully envision what would support the viewpoint is immaterial to the fact that seedy has not. Do you disagree?

Seedy's fighting the mechanical interpretation, she's conceding that I can be entirely right about what ac's behavior means here, but she's resisting the conclusion based on a premise that she hasn't supported yet (what scum can actually have) and claiming doubts about the ability to predict the setup (which has almost never been true)

i feel like you and seedy crossed wires bc i dont know, what this actually means and doesnt, feel like whats happened here to me? but ive been very bad at interpreting specifically this whole conversation, and i think its because im tired, of it existing