The Wander Island Incident - Night Four - Five For One [13/21]

Also, stated scum read on Solaris was partially due to thinking that they were on a team with aC.
Now no longer believes that those two are on a team, also would be willing to vote for aC, however instead retains their vote on Solaris.
That doesn't quite add up.

I can still believe they're on a team together, and I did not explicitly say that I no longer felt it was the case. I did feel it less at my last post; specifically the suspicion that aC/Solaris were working at distancing themselves in a subtle manner. By virtue of me reading both of them as scum, I can still believe they're coaligned and scum would be more than happy to throw aC under the bus. If aC flips scum you bet I'm doubling down on my existing leads.

Pilot, do you think this big argument between the two is potentially staged?

BlazerC is town; so no. Cannot be staged.

-If AC does have an on death role do you disagree with my assessment here? Namely that they've played in a way that indicates they aren't super concerned with dying? Do you disagree that it doesn't make sense for scum to play that way barring a suicide lynch being what they have? I ask this because if there's such a role in play Schazer's been softing the shit out of it.

With four people outright claiming or implying it, I can believe scum would play to it. Hell I'd say trying to set up paranoia with regards to lynching/targeting someone is a realistic move for scum to make - but I do not think this is the case. I can see scum aC playing fearlessly and detached as a means to try and make their contributions less informative. See: post #442.