The Wander Island Incident - Night Four - Five For One [13/21]

Hey, just to catch up and address some Me stuff from yesterday that I didn't have the time to answer at the time.

How's that look to you wrt them volunteering an answer; NTA wasn't in my direct asks

Show Content

SpoilerI mean it's a slight towntell to get involved in conversations you don't have to, but that's mostly when it's done in a meaningful way. I didn't, and don't, feel like NTA really added anything or was trying to add anything and nothing was really moved forward by them doing so.

Also, and this is smaller issue for reasons including 'well now you can just say that for anything', but once I said I thought it was a towntell other people doing the same (and honestly I noticed it a few times after from other people in less notable ways) it became less of one.

Second point, the light townread was nice but my post asking about assuming townfirms based on a lynch was a semi-sarcastic response to a Reyweld post trying to draw out suspicious responses, not an honest question.

What are your thoughts on Jaq?

Other thoughts:

- I'd like someone to explain the BlazerC is scum case to me, by someone I mean Solaris or Schazer.
- I don't like how Numbers claimed just because Q did but I could kind of understand they might have been worried about votes suddenly going their way in the last half hour.
- I had a good feeling about Jaq's first post but then he goes into just coaching Numbers for the next few which pinged as kind of weird for me. I don't think it's scum coaching scum, it was way too late in the day to suddenly be doing that, but there were enough other things they could be commenting on like the sudden Blazer votes or the Reyweld question that just focusing on Numbers like that makes me like them less and conversely Numbers a little more.

Now for today:

Also why are you singling out Justice Watch's survival as suspect and not say, Slorange or anyone else?

Why are you singling out Blazer's nonmention of Slorange and not say, TehPilot or anyone else?

(Please someone continue the chain but also I kind of want to hear the answer joke or not.)

Also do not like aC's responses! I also don't like Blazer's post attacking/voting them for its overfocus but I do that shit all the time so I feel like I don't have a right to judge (also unlike almost everyone apparently I otherwise felt pretty good about him to this point).

Solaris - gay
Schazer - intially scum read, now townie
Numbers - scum

aC but why? Throwing out vague reads and comments is one of the reasons you look shady, and is explicitly what Blazer is calling you out on, and your answer to a question about reads is this? Explain in further detail please.

Would vote aC here but instead I mean, Vote: Justice Watch. Seriously, I don't have issues against roleplaying (especially in a crazy flavour game, A+ so far Mirdini), but this isn't an RPG. Stuff is going on and you need to comment about it or I'll start to think Blazer might have a point!

Justice Watch, aC, please actually talk about things in depth and with detail. Start with the Q wagon if nothing else.

By which I mean I disagree completely with Blazer's scum logic post. Denying reads is one thing, but ultimately I feel like eliminating active (therefore more dangerous) players over lurkers who will just eat up town's attention is the more natural move.

Robust Laser, when you're back from sleep could you also comment on the Q wagon?