The Wander Island Incident - Night Four - Five For One [13/21]

If their goal was to avoid attention D1 they could have just Not Done That without any sort of risk. If their goal was to further a D1 lynch, they would have picked either of the two wagons with 3 votes.

I think the defence of "it was someone joking in rvs" which was the first half of this post is true and didn't need the further justification which makes me like the justification less?
"Not posting" only avoid attention for day one and is a very poor long term mafia strategy. People who didn't post today (like me) are going to be alright for the early game, barring a vigilante who hates lurkers, but completely untrustworthy by the end unless they can pull some impressive stuff out by then, it's a poor scum gambit.
Scum want to look like they are doing something without actively actually achieving anything, because being active makes people trust you more. Scum don't necessarily want to push a lynch on day one, it's way easier to ensure that nothing happens and the town goes into day two less informed.

My reread of specifically just reyweld actually sort of makes me feel like reyweld has said less than I thought they did given the number of posts they have made.
Lot of defensive reflection, not a lot of material, which I realise is a bit hypocritical for someone who's made one post of any merit.
Which is, something.

I don't think Reyweld is really strongly reading as scum either it's just there isn't a lot else to go on right now.

"Solaris is clearly scum but her death can wait until tomorrow"

Can I get a preview? Why do you think this?

It's because I'm gay.