The Wander Island Incident - Night Four - Five For One [13/21]

Sorry I'm mostly doing these long posts but I'm pretty busy nowadays.

That's actually what I'm doing too and why I'll probably keep doing quote walls. I'm gonna have relatively small windows to post, so I'm trying to keep everything encapsulated.

Speaking of Sai, at first I feel pretty good about just from a content point of view but a lot of the posts he's come up with since reappearing seem fairly rushed for said content (giant quote walls, post by post response with varying quality of comments and questions). That sort of makes me wary, since at I find scum play is usually about quantity over quality as far as analysis goes. Sai, what do you think of me?

They look rushed because they are rushed. If there were more involved arguments, I'd probably be going over the same posts multiple times in these things.

I don't have a read on you. I doubt I will until there's more discussion. I think your first vote for numbers was fine, albeit inoffensive. I don't find numbers' posts as incriminating as you did, because I think they just make it obvious that they're new more than anything else.

Why are we all assuming a random lynch will give us a bunch of townfirms?

I'm not. I'm saying that in Schazer's hypothetical about a D1 lynch being a guaranteed, strictly a townie-led mislynch, then it'd still be worthwhile.

Numbers isn't really doing anything to make me want to change my vote. Could move to Q with an off chance of NTA or maybe Sai if that's the way things go.

Can you explain why you'd want to lynch Not The Author?
Also, is there a particular reason that you you wouldn't want to lynch Schazer?