The Wander Island Incident - Night Four - Five For One [13/21]

@Sai:

Thoughts on my earlier reyweld thing from these?

I meant that adding to another bandwagon would be a bad scum tactic, yes.

If their goal was to avoid attention D1 they could have just Not Done That without any sort of risk. If their goal was to further a D1 lynch, they would have picked either of the two wagons with 3 votes.

Palamedes, CB, Blazer opinions on this?

I'm reading it kind of like, town blind? This feels a bit too hardheaded and ignores obvious scenarios that scum would be more conscious of before they'd say anything.


Reyweld you got an opinion on schazers first vote on seedy?

Reywald feels very blind at the moment to me as well, if that's what you wanted to comment on.

So they feel okay I guess. No strong opinion on it though yet.

I mean more like scum is more conscious/worried about a teammate getting wagoned day one and reywelds plowing right past that possibility

I don't think scum has that hole in their perspective