RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day One: Incident Report
08-23-2018, 03:10 AM
(08-23-2018, 02:58 AM)Numbers Wrote: »(08-23-2018, 02:29 AM)Sai Wrote: »[quote="LegendaryQ" pid='217565' dateline='1534990169']
Quote:- Thoughts on Numbers in general? (newbie town or perhaps something else, or too early to tell, or....?)The fact that Granola picked on you, for instance, and straight up ignored numbers mattered more to me than the fact that numbers' post was basically a worse version of yours.
And yes, this was interesting. To be honest, I was kind of expecting to get at least one or two votes from my pressuring when I saw everyone disappointed and disapproving of both me and Q's pressuring. Maybe it was because it seemed I already had enough votes, maybe because the long post gathered more attention.
I honestly think it's just that people are holding you to a lower standard, but it matters to me whether or not they say that or give any other reasoning (like, oh, I found this post of theirs to be townie so we can excuse it).
(08-23-2018, 02:59 AM)Reyweld Wrote: »Sai, your return was well worth the wait.
I don't follow why you are voting for Schazer though? Could you explain it to me, and also why you think they would be a better lynch than LegendaryQ?
I think that Schazer was aggressively nonproductive and tried to remain content free long after it was appropriate. I think that asking to be shot was abnormal. I think that it's actually kinda weird that people would post that they'd want to shoot her, but not also vote for her.
I'd actually be okay with lynching Q too, but I think that pressuring a potential lynch on Schazer now would tell us more than just adding another vote on Q would.
(08-23-2018, 03:00 AM)Acionyx Wrote: »Yeah can you explain the actual reasoning because all this is saying is "a thing happened"
I think Granola's reply to Q reads as natural, and that teammates don't tend to post very naturally to each other.