The Wander Island Incident - Night Four - Five For One [13/21]

The Wander Island Incident - Night Four - Five For One [13/21]
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day One: Incident Report
(08-22-2018, 01:13 PM)Reyweld Wrote: »Something I do find interesting is LegendaryQ's #153, which basically says to me that LegendaryQ has been ignoring the conversation because it’s just “RVS time silliness”. Not only does it offer no substantial stance on me, but tries to brush aside everything being currently discussed. Instead of *trying* to offer anything new, they put the onus back onto me.

So I'm seeing a misinterpretation here, so I'm gonna take a moment to clarify and more specifically point out what I consider "RVS time silliness."

I already previously noted that I consider RVS time to essentially end at #88, so thusly I consider things beyond that to not be RVS time post-#88, and things pre-#88 to be RVS. (ignoring Schazer, I second Acio's want for a gun)

The posts I consider to be of your (as in Reyweld's) concern that I don't care about because they're regarding earlier RVS are posts #95 and #116, that started the "Reyweld debate." In short, these posts are you talking about Acio and Airey's early RVS votes and disappearance, and an earlyish vote by Numbers that you saw a potential scumminess to (but that you acknowledged was probably just a joke vote). #116 is you responding to Acio asking for clarification on your thoughts on the Numbers vote. All three of those posts (Acio/Airey vote + Numbers vote) you reference I consider to be RVS, so I don't really care about #95 and #116. This is what I refer to as "RVS time silliness."

What I do care about is the resulting discussion between Acio and others about what your response in #116 means (e.g. Acio suspecting town blind and asking others), and that was what I was responding to in the post you quoted. Me passing the "onus" to you is me noticing that you hadn't really responded to that debate at all (you'd responded to Acio in #116 and left it there), and I wanted to see what your opinion was of their analysis of you.

Hopefully this makes things more clear.

Now, with that out of the way, other thoughts:
- Schazer's shenanigans are a nullread for me. They're annoying and if I thought Dini was crazy enough to put a jester in a game I'd assume that that was the reason why, but I don't so I'm leaving it at a nullread and hoping that something meaningful comes from Schazer in the future.
- Willing to support a Sai lynch, or at least make it look more threatening in a hope to make them come out.
- Numbers is okay I guess. Want to see more of them -- they've been paying more attention to what hasn't been happening as opposed to what has (NTA hasn't posted, where did Sai go?, etc.), which isn't a bad thing, but I'd prefer both over just one.
Quote


Messages In This Thread
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day One: Incident Report - by LegendaryQ - 08-22-2018, 11:13 PM